Post Politics
New home.
Still the best political coverage.
Correction to This Article
The article misattributed comments about a 2007 Bush administration memo on religious organizations' eligibility for government funding. It was a letter from the advocacy group Americans United for the Separation of Church and State that called the memo "flatly erroneous" and "legally suspect," not Justice Department nominee Dawn Johnsen or department lawyer Martin Lederman.
Page 2 of 2   <      

Obama Cautious on Faith-Based Initiatives

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity

The document also said the director of the White House faith-based office, "acting through the counsel to the President, may seek the opinion of the Attorney General on any constitutional and statutory questions involving existing or prospective programs and practices."

A Constitutional Right?

Steven T. McFarland, vice president and chief legal officer at World Vision, which supports aid efforts in 100 countries, said needy people around the world will lose if the Obama Justice Department changes course. The Christian charity helps victims of earthquakes, famine and other natural disasters, provides food and support to refugees and abandoned children, and cares for people suffering from HIV-AIDS across three continents.

Richard Stearns, president of World Vision's American operations, sits on a presidential advisory panel, and has emphasized the importance of hiring to World Vision's identity with members of the administration's faith-based office, the charity said. The Bellevue, Wash.-based group has been using religion as a factor in hiring for years.

"What is at stake is whether faith-based organizations can continue to exercise their constitutional right to remain faith-based and still compete for federal grants," said McFarland, who headed the Task Force on Faith-Based and Community Initiatives in the Bush Justice Department. "The power to determine the criteria for employees is the power to determine the ultimate identity, mission, and direction of the organization, nothing less."

But several Democratic lawmakers, including Rep. Robert C. Scott (Va.), are calling on Obama to take aggressive steps to roll back the Bush administration's government-wide initiatives. Scott said he is particularly concerned with the civil rights implications of the hiring question, since many religious congregations are not racially diverse and faith-based employment decisions by federal grantees can limit job opportunities for minorities.

"We had that debate 40 years ago, and we concluded that you can't discriminate on the basis of employment," Scott said. "If you cannot comply with equal opportunities in employment, you just can't win a government contract."

A Complex Issue

Experts said the issue is unusually complex.

Ira C. Lupu, a professor who studies law and religion at the George Washington University, said several other programs include language on religion and hiring, in addition to the Bush-era executive orders and the Justice Department legal memos interpreting the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a 1993 law designed to protect those exercising religious beliefs.

Several federal grant programs contain language from Congress forbidding religious favoritism in employment. They include the Justice Department's juvenile justice crime prevention efforts, which fund anti-gang initiatives and after-school programs that sometimes have a religious bent, and the Department of Health and Human Services' drug rehabilitation initiatives.

But other laws authorizing community service block grants to states and local governments for social services include language making clear that religious groups that do faith-based hiring have a right to win grant money. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act also offers an exemption from the ban on religious discrimination in employment for houses of worship, schools and churches. These rules can be altered only with Congress's approval.

Finally, Congress has been silent on the question of faith-based hiring by grantees in some federal grant programs, such as food-distribution efforts. Changes by the White House and executive branch in those programs might require the least amount of political capital or legal wrangling, experts said.

Lynn, of Americans United, called the president's cautious approach "a big surprise and of course a big disappointment for those of us fighting this during the Bush years." But he emphasized that Obama could be reaching to find common ground, perhaps by requiring religious groups who win federal funds to set up nonprofit offshoots: "I still have a guarded optimism that he will do in the long run the things he said in Zanesville."


<       2

More in the Politics Section

Campaign Finance -- Presidential Race

2008 Fundraising

See who is giving to the '08 presidential candidates.

© 2009 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity