» This Story:Read +| Comments
Archive   |   Biography   |   RSS Feed   |   Discussion   |   Podcast   |   Opinions Home

President Obama's Slow but Steady Progress on Education

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Ruth Marcus
Wednesday, September 23, 2009

President Obama's health-care proposals are under attack from the left and right. His bid to overhaul the financial regulatory system is foundering. His effort to institute a cap-and-trade regime to combat global warming is all but dead for the year.

This Story

Beneath all this headline turmoil, Obama is overseeing a quiet upheaval in the nation's approach to education from preschool through college. I've been somewhat skeptical of the president's ability to pull this off, questioning his determination to stand up to two political giants: the student-lending lobby and teachers unions.

The final results aren't in. The biggest challenge -- overhauling the No Child Left Behind law -- has no clear legislative path in sight. But when the National Education Association unloads on an Obama administration proposal to promote charter schools and teacher accountability as a "series of top-down directives," you know the administration is doing something bold.

So this is an appropriate moment for me to eat at least a spoonful of crow.

"There's this sort of slow, persistent progress," says Amy Wilkins of the Education Trust, a leading advocacy group for education reform. "If this were a football game, there are not a lot of those long dramatic passes, but this is a ground game where they are grinding out big important change without a lot of fanfare."

As with any major renovation, money helps -- a lot.

The House approved legislation last week to transform the federal student-lending program. If the Senate signs on, private lenders, who prospered with the twin benefits of fat federal subsidies and guarantees of the loans they issued, would be moved aside in favor of direct lending by the government.

The Clinton administration tried to take this sensible step 16 years ago, only to be slapped down by the private-lending lobby. Now, while not certain, the change is apt to happen -- in no small part because the administration pushed to allow the change to be done under the budget "reconciliation" process, requiring 50 votes rather than 60.

Cutting out this "unwarranted subsidy," as Obama put it in a speech Monday, would free up almost $90 billion over 10 years. The House would use the largest chunk of that money to raise Pell Grant amounts for low-income college students; the grant amounts have lagged far behind increases in tuition costs.

The money is also directed in other, innovative ways. About $10 billion would go to community colleges -- the biggest infusion of federal cash ever to these institutions.

Colleges would get $2.5 billion to figure out how to keep track of how many students manage to graduate, as opposed to piling up debt and then dropping out. In the House, private colleges were able to wiggle out of this requirement; the Senate ought to hold them to it.

Another $8 billion would go to early childhood education programs, which vary widely in quality, with the goal of establishing some standards and accountability for preschool programs.


CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +| Comments

More Washington Post Opinions

PostPartisan

Post Partisan

Quick takes from The Post's opinion writers.

Washington Sketch

Washington Sketch

Dana Milbank writes about political theater in the capital.

Tom Toles

Tom Toles

See his latest editorial cartoon.

© 2009 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity