By Ed O'Keefe
Friday, October 9, 2009
The U.S. Postal Service lost billions of dollars in revenue during the last fiscal year as the volume of mail plunged. Lawmakers may one day soon consider cutting mail delivery to five days a week. They also may need to sort out how the Postal Service pays for the benefits of current and future retirees.
But most customers only care about one thing: The fate of their neighborhood post office.
On Friday the Postal Service must turn over an updated list to the Postal Regulatory Commission of sites still being considered for closure or consolidation.
Despite the concern and confusion generated by the drawn-out process, Postmaster General John E. Potter believes customers should extend their concern.
"This is part of the problem when it comes to discussing the Postal Service," he told a lunchtime crowd at the National Press Club in Washington. "Because here we are talking about a $5 billion ongoing deficit and we're all wrapped up in an issue that's probably worth on the order of $20 million to $100 million at best."
Closures account for a small piece of Potter's grand plans to remake the U.S. mail system. He's advocated for reducing mail delivery to five days, for a smaller workforce and a greener fleet of vehicles -- and maybe, just maybe, the chance to sell something other than stamps.
"Given the changing use of the mail by the American public -- we're not faulting anyone -- and given what's going on with the economy, we need more flexibility to manage this place so that we can get into the black," Potter said.
He's not involved in the details of possible closures, but Potter said it's unlikely any facility will close before January. He's delegated the other dirty details to district managers and other Washington-based officials.
"Our folks have reached out to communities and will continue to do that, but keep in mind that we're facing a significant gap going forward of $5 billion. So people cannot expect business as usual and that we will be able to fund everything that we currently do," he said.
Potter wants Americans to start talking about how the Postal Service will exist into the next decade and beyond. He wants a national conversation among lawmakers, the mailing industry, consumers and everyone else. Americans will have to consider mail volume, the frequency of delivery and the cost, he said.
The Postal Service operates more retail outlets than Starbucks, Wal-Mart and McDonald's combined, Potter said.
"And we can only sell stamps," he lamented. "I think we're going to have to rationalize. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that we're not going to sell the same number of stamps going forward."
So if Congress told him next week that he could try selling just one service or product, what would it be?
"I'd be a bank," he said, but later admitted that "that's not going to happen."
"Politics," he said.Fumbling on Fingerprints
The Census Bureau hired more than 162,000 temporary workers this year to work on preparations for the 2010 decennial census. The agency had to fingerprint each worker for a mandatory FBI criminal background check. But the Census Bureau failed to get readable prints for at least a fifth of those temporary hires, according to a Government Accountability report released this week.
Poorly trained Census employees improperly printed their temporary colleagues and the FBI advised the agency to conduct background checks based solely on an applicant's name, the report said.
"It is possible that more than 200 people with unclassifiable prints had disqualifying criminal records but still worked, and had contact with the public during address canvassing," the GAO estimated.
Workers who do address canvassing go street-by-street to make sure that addresses do indeed exist.
Of the temporary hires that did get printed, approximately 1 percent had criminal records, the GAO said. Of those, 750 were fired, because they had committed more serious crimes such as rape, manslaughter and child abuse.
The Census Bureau said it will retrain employees to address the GAO's concerns.
It has been working on its fingerprint background checks, spokesman Stephen Buckner said. When asked, Buckner was unaware of any incidences of criminal activity committed by the temporary employees. This was the first time the Census Bureau has fingerprinted its temporary workers.What of the DCIPS?
Your (substitute) Diarist received several anxious queries from readers regarding the fate of the Defense Civilian Intelligence Personnel System, the pay-for-performance system used by some defense and intelligence personnel. Concerned readers wanted to know if their version of the National Security Personnel System also got repealed in the compromise version of the Defense Department authorization bill announced Wednesday.
Turns out the compromise suspends DCIPS for one year pending a congressional review. This means current employees stay in the system, but nobody else can transition into it. The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which has used DCIPS longer than any other agency, is exempt from the suspension.
Joe Davidson is away. He will resume writing this column when he returns. Direct your Diary-themed tips, queries, rants and concerns to email@example.com. Read Ed O'Keefe's blog, the Federal Eye, at http://www.washingtonpost.com/federaleye.