Iran denies allegations of tensions with Israel at conference

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, October 22, 2009; 12:42 PM

TEHRAN -- Representatives of Iran and Israel attended an international conference on nuclear disarmament last month in Egypt, but Iranian officials Thursday denied news reports that the two archenemies engaged in direct dialogue at the meeting amid conflicting accounts of heated exchanges.

According to the International Commission on Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament, which convened the Sept. 29-30 conference in Cairo, participants included two Iranians and three Israelis, notably Iran's chief ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency and a senior official of the Israel Atomic Energy Commission.

At least three media outlets reported that the two sides exchanged heated comments during an open session of the conference, which was sponsored by the governments of Australia and Japan. Officials in Iran and Israel separately denied that representatives of their countries either met face-to-face or spoke to each other directly.

The Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported that at one point during the conference, Ali Asghar Soltanieh, Iran's ambassador to the IAEA, directly asked Meirav Zafary-Odiz, chief of policy and arms control at the Israel Atomic Energy Commission, whether Israel possesses nuclear weapons. The paper said Zafary-Odiz smiled but did not respond. It also said she told the conference that Israel would be prepared to discuss a nuclear freeze in the Middle East only at some future date when the region was at peace.

Australia's The Age newspaper said Iranian and Israeli delegates had a "very robust exchange" during the conference. Agence France-Presse said another Israeli participant, Shlomo Ben-Ami, a former internal security and foreign minister who sits on the commission's advisory board, traded heated remarks with Soltanieh, with the Iranian denying the Israeli's charge that Iran intends to produce a nuclear weapon.

In Tehran, Ali Akbar Javanfekr, a press adviser to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, disputed the media accounts and accused Israel of trying to obstruct nuclear negotiations between Iran and the United States.

"Israel is illegitimate; we don't recognize that country," Javanfekr said. "There can never be any negotiations and relations with it." He added: "This is Zionist news spinning. They are fabricating lies, to give themselves stature and credit."

In Israel, a spokeswoman for the Atomic Energy Commission, Yael Doron, said each country stated its position on nuclear disarmament separately at the conference. "The two sides did not meet or speak to one another directly," she said, according to the Associated Press.

In a joint statement after the Cairo conference, the Australian and Japanese co-chairmen of the international commission said the meeting "examined various options for creating a Middle East zone free of weapons of mass destruction," but they shed no light on the dispute over the purported Iranian-Israeli exchanges. The statement said only, "Short of nuclear disarmament, there was lively debate over the possible shape and potential value of assurances by nuclear weapon states about non-use of nuclear weapons against countries without such weapons."

The conflicting reports about the gathering came as Iranian, U.S., Russian and other negotiators in Vienna awaited a green light from Iran's leaders on a draft agreement to transfer the bulk of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile out of the country as part of a proposed deal to resolve a dispute over Tehran's uranium-enrichment program while providing much-needed fuel for an Iranian medical research reactor. IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei has said he wants a final answer on the draft agreement by Friday.

Iranian leaders generally seemed positive about the proposal, but Soltanieh on Wednesday cautioned against hasty conclusions and stressed that Iran's leaders now have to decide.

Rahman Ghahremanpour, a nonproliferation expert at the Tehran-based Center for Strategic Studies, said in an interview that the Vienna talks could pave the way for a solution to the long-running dispute. The United States and its allies have accused Iran of covertly planning to fabricate a nuclear weapon, while Iran asserts that its nuclear program is strictly peaceful and intended only to generate electricity, as well as produce a small amount of isotopes for medical purposes.


CONTINUED     1        >


More in World

Radiating Danger

Radiating Danger

An interactive special report tracking the spread of nuclear weapons.

PostGlobal

PostGlobal

A discussion of global issues by leading thinkers from around the world.

facebook

Connect Online

Share and comment on Post world news on Facebook and Twitter.

© 2009 The Washington Post Company