Crediting plundered art
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
The Oct. 18 Style and Arts article "At the Phillips, Black and White but Never Plain" was accompanied by a photograph of an African statue labeled as "collected around the turn of the century in what is now the Democratic Republic of the Congo."
Talking about such art as "collected" is the equivalent of saying that a menorah from the Poland of 1939-45 was "collected" without mentioning that its availability was the result of the Nazi genocide that wiped out families and friends and nearly their cultures.
The genocide in the Congo during the administration of King Leopold II of Belgium (1885-1908) with the agreement of Western European powers was notorious at the time. (Joseph Conrad's "Heart of Darkness" was inspired by it).
Man Ray, Picasso and the curators of these objects in our museums cannot be credited with sufficient incompetence not to be aware of this inconvenient history.
I think we owe those victims at least the courtesy of remembering how and at what price their art came to grace our museums.
R.A. Metcalf, Rockville
