Fed Page   |  Column Archive  |    RSS   |   Daily Politics Q&A

In the Loop: Afghanistan's sudden population drop

It turns out that counting the people in Afghanistan isn't all that easy.
It turns out that counting the people in Afghanistan isn't all that easy. (Nikki Kahn/the Washington Post)
  Enlarge Photo     Buy Photo

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Al Kamen
Monday, November 2, 2009

President Obama is still working hard to figure out the next steps in the very difficult war in Afghanistan. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top commander in the field, is pressing for an additional 40,000 troops. Obama's top advisers are split. Americans seem to be increasingly skeptical about prospects for victory.

But the task has suddenly become a lot easier: The CIA has gotten rid of 5 million Afghans! Poof! Just like that!

Turns out the agency was substantially overestimating the country's population. The long-used number -- 33.6 million -- was derived from a 30-year-old census that has now been determined to be high.

Not just a little too high, but 5.2 million people too high. The new official count, 28,396,000, is lower by more than 15 percent. A CIA spokesman e-mailed Friday that the agency's population figures, both the old and new ones, were provided by the population division of the U.S. Census Bureau.

So that's a lot of phantom Afghans -- including maybe a few hundred thousand Taliban supporters, maybe a million? -- that we no longer have to worry about. It also means that Iraq is officially larger in population (28,945,657) than Afghanistan.

The CIA, which apparently posted the new numbers last week, acknowledged on its World Factbook Web site that "this is a significantly revised figure" and blamed the Soviet invaders for messing things up in the first place. On a more hopeful note, it says that "a new Afghan census is scheduled to take place in 2010."

But for now the change means the administration might want to revisit many of the metrics it uses to calculate the situation and the progress or lack thereof in Afghanistan. Per-capita income numbers may have to be reworked, per-capita aid figures are altered -- maybe Washington can get by with sending less aid.

And it may turn out, even discounting the phony ballots, that voter turnout in the recent election, as a percentage of those eligible, was substantially higher than had been thought.

Unclear why the numbers changed last week. The 33.6 million figure had been on the agency's site for quite a long time.

It may be that someone there or at the Census Bureau spotted Web postings by Steve Donnelly, an urban planner and demographer who signed up as a civilian to help the State Department sort out census and other matters in Tikrit and other sites in Iraq a couple of years ago.

Donnelly said he simply "started a link on Afghan population figures" the week before last "because I could not understand why the CIA Factbook and other supposedly authoritative sources always put Afghan population figures at 30 to 33 million when all my routine civilian sources always showed less then 27 million."

"I just looked at various open sources," Donnelly said, "because what people were using just didn't make sense."


CONTINUED     1        >

© 2009 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity