Washington Sketch: Republicans give global-warming hearing the cold shoulder

Republicans' chairs remained empty as the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee marked up its climate-change legislation.
Republicans' chairs remained empty as the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee marked up its climate-change legislation. (Harry Hamburg/associated Press)
By Dana Milbank
Wednesday, November 4, 2009

The senators' nameplates were lined up neatly on the green felt. A row of black leather chairs awaited senatorial bottoms. The microphones were live and the water iced.

But something was missing as the Senate environment committee took up its landmark climate-change bill on Tuesday morning: Republicans. The members of the minority party, unhappy with the legislation, settled on a novel strategy. They refused to show up.

The Democrats shrugged off the legislative boycott and spent the morning living out their fantasy: a world without Republicans. A contest hadn't been so lopsided since the 1980 Moscow Olympics, when the Soviets won most of the medals because of an American-led boycott.

"The Republican Party has increasingly become the party of 'no,' " announced Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who sits on the Democratic side. "President Obama ran on the campaign model of 'Yes, we can,' and our Republican friends seem to be saying 'No, we won't.' "

No objection was heard.

"I find it shocking to see the empty chairs there," said Sen. Frank Lautenberg (N.J.), beckoning across the U-shaped table and scolding the "duck-and-run" Republicans. He alternately likened the minority to "a child staying out of school because he doesn't like what the teacher is providing," and to soldiers gone AWOL. "You had a responsibility when you were called to duty to show up, even if you disagreed with the strategy," he lectured.

Nobody argued the point.

Even Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, a Democratic convert, found his former GOP colleagues behaving in a "very, very unfortunate" manner. "We have a practice in the world's greatest deliberative body of disagreeing without being disagreeable. But you can't disagree with an empty chair."

As Specter spoke, the distinguished Sen. George Voinovich of Ohio -- a Republican! -- made his way toward the table. Voinovich, who is retiring next year, delivered an emotional appeal to halt proceedings until the EPA could thoroughly analyze the bill. "What I'm doing today is I'm pleading to you and to the chairman, as a matter of the golden rule or the second great commandment, or just -- just decency," he said, his voice breaking. "This is not something on my part that I'm trying to con you out of. . . . I think we can get something done. I'm asking Madam Chairman and I'm asking this committee: Give us some time."

But Madam Chairman, Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), was not inclined to give Voinovich even enough time to finish his statement. "You finished your 12 minutes," she informed him before he was done.

"Can I ask for another three minutes?" Voinovich asked.

"I'll give you another minute," Boxer countered. "I've got colleagues that just don't have time."

CONTINUED     1        >

© 2009 The Washington Post Company