'Smart growth': A start or a failure?
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
The Nov. 2 Metro article "Study calls Md. smart growth a flop" leads to an inescapable conclusion: We in Maryland need to do more -- more to create walkable neighborhoods, more to give people transportation choices, more to save tax money and more to protect the Chesapeake Bay.
But the misleading headline did a disservice. What the study really found is that the policies I instituted as governor haven't been enough. It's true: Maryland's work is not done. Our laws and programs should be updated as we learn what works best. But the study doesn't call the Maryland programs a "flop."
Despite the need to improve and strengthen the policies, smart growth has done a great deal for Maryland. It placed the social services building right in downtown Easton and aided the University of Maryland's efforts to revitalize Hagerstown. It permanently preserved 400,000 acres. And it helped revitalize places such as Silver Spring, Hyattsville and Baltimore, adding thousands of homes to transit-accessible neighborhoods. Because the study looked only at single-family homes, it couldn't report any of these benefits.
Today, it's more important than ever that government policies don't promote sprawl but instead help communities meet the demand for more convenient, affordable neighborhoods. And improving the smart-growth program should be a key part of Maryland's plans.
Parris N. Glendening, Annapolis
The writer, the president of the Smart Growth Leadership Institute, was governor of Maryland from 1995 to 2003.
--
It takes little intelligence to see how Montgomery County's foolish implementation of smart-growth policies continues to have detrimental effects across the area.


