Education before family?

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Sunday, November 8, 2009

Regarding the Nov. 3 Metro article "The locals live and learn," on families who board their children at nearby private schools:

At first, the sentence "other Washington parents say they're too busy to have the kids at home" made me angry. But now it just makes me sad.

Why have children if you are too busy to have them at home? My son left for college in August, and I miss him terribly. I would love to have him home again.

My husband and I both work outside the home. We were fortunate that I did not have to work full time. But even if I had, there would have been time for my son, just as my husband made the time.

These children are growing up without knowing their families. Is school really that important?

Heidi Menocal, Annapolis



© 2009 The Washington Post Company