Will new accusations hurt Dixon?

Baltimore mayor tries to stop developer from testifying on gift cards

Sheila Dixon might be harmed politically, not legally, by revelations that a third developer possibly donated gift cards to her, some say.
Sheila Dixon might be harmed politically, not legally, by revelations that a third developer possibly donated gift cards to her, some say. (Jed Kirschbaum/baltimore Sun Via Associated Press)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 12, 2009

Revelations that a third Baltimore developer might have donated gift cards to Baltimore Mayor Sheila Dixon are more likely to cause political damage than legal harm, observers said.

On Thursday, Circuit Court Judge Dennis M. Sweeney will consider arguments by Dixon's attorneys to keep developer Glenn Charlow from testifying that he bought Target gift cards and gave them to the mayor, believing they would be used for activities at her church.

Dixon is charged with taking gift cards that she solicited on behalf of the city's poor from two other developers -- Patrick Turner and former boyfriend Ronald H. Lipscomb -- and spending about 60 of them on herself, her family and her friends. The Charlow allegations, emerging in a motion filed by her attorneys Tuesday, had not been previously disclosed and are arising as her trial begins this week.

"That definitely ups the ante," said Herb Smith, a political science professor at McDaniel College. "It broadens the offense. It creates an atmosphere of 'What is next?' "

David Gray, a University of Maryland Law School professor, called the new allegations a "side show" that state prosecutor Robert A. Rohrbaugh could be using to prejudice the jury.

After reviewing a defense motion to suppress the evidence, Gray said the Charlow revelations are being introduced "too late in the game" and predicted that Sweeney would not allow a jury to hear them.

Dixon has repeatedly proclaimed her innocence. Appearing at a Veterans Day event Wednesday, she declined to answer questions about the gift cards. "You better respect me, and I'm not going to answer any questions," she said.

The new allegations are not criminal charges but could be offered as evidence to show a pattern of behavior, Gray said.

The new revelations "can't help her," said Don Norris, professor and chairman of the public policy department at University of Maryland Baltimore County, but they might not damage her career. "My view is that none of this matters politically," Norris said. "If she walks out of these two trials acquitted, then she has a much stronger political hand in the city than she did before."



More in the Maryland Section

Blog: Maryland Moment

Blog: Md. Politics

Washington Post staff writers provide breaking news coverage of your county and state government.

Local Explorer

Local Explorer

Use Local Explorer to learn about Washington, D.C., Maryland and Virginia communities.

Md. Congressional Primary

Election Results

Obama and McCain swept the region on February 12.

FOLLOW METRO ON:
Facebook Twitter RSS
|
GET LOCAL ALERTS:
© 2009 The Washington Post Company