Correction to This Article
An earlier version of Carol Shaw Greger's letter misspelled the first name of Nov. 13 letter writer Sara Imershein.
Abortion in the health-care debate

Monday, November 16, 2009

In their Nov. 13 letter, Reps. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) and Joe Pitts (R-Pa.) presented a tired argument that was logically indefensible. They justified their position on abortion in the health-care bill to "preserve the right of conscience" of those who believe that federal funds should not be expended to provide abortions.

But my federal tax dollars supported the invasion of Iraq, which I opposed. Did Congress protect my "right of conscience"?

My federal tax dollars supported the operation of an interrogation program at Guantanamo Bay, which I opposed. Did Congress protect my "right of conscience"?

If Mr. Stupak and Mr. Pitts are going to oppose the legislation, they should come up with a more logical argument.

Barbara T. Osgood, Fairfax


Where's the responsiblity of women to use birth control to avoid unwanted pregnancy?

In her Nov. 13 letter, Sara Imershein, an obstetrician, wrote, "Abortion is a safe, legal medical procedure." She made it sound like removing a bad tooth instead of a potential life in the womb.

I am not against women choosing to abort their unborn fetuses, but please don't force my Catholic family to pay for it.

Carol Shaw Greger, Bowie

Post a Comment

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2009 The Washington Post Company