Fed Page   |   E-Mail Newsletter  Fed Insider E-Mail   |    RSS   |   Column Archive

Federal Diary: Federal Protective Service under scrutiny

Rep. Thompson
Rep. Thompson (Haraz N. Ghanbari - AP)
  Enlarge Photo    

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Joe Davidson
Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Feeling snug in your government building?

Before you get too comfortable, consider these incidents involving the Federal Protective Service (FPS), the agency responsible for safeguarding federal facilities, described in a Government Accountability Office report:

-- An infant in a carrier was placed on the moving belt of a security X-ray machine while the child's mother looked for identification. "Because the guard was not paying attention and the machine's safety features had been disabled, the infant in the carrier was sent through the X-ray machine."

-- An "armed guard was found asleep at his post after taking the pain killer prescription drug Percocet during the night shift."

-- In one region, the "FPS has not provided the required 8 hours of x-ray or magnetometer training to its 1,500 guards since 2004."

-- During a test of security procedures, a bag with a fake gun and knife went through an X-ray machine, and a guard failed to identify the weapons.

-- During a second test, a magnetometer and a hand wand detected a knife hidden on an official, but a guard failed to locate the knife and the official entered the facility.

These findings, from a September report, are in addition to the GAO's recent sting that showed that bomb-making materials could be smuggled into federal buildings right under guards' noses.

The GAO paints a scary picture of a federal agency that poorly supervises a security force largely composed of private guards. That supervision, or lack of it, is one point the House Committee on Homeland Security is set to take up at a Wednesday hearing on the FPS.

Another subject certain to arise is the overwhelming reliance on private contractors to protect federal facilities. There are about 15,000 private guards, compared with fewer than 1,000 federal law enforcement officers, in the FPS.

The appropriate balance of contract workers and federal employees is a matter of debate in many government venues. But clearly, there are times when protecting federal facilities is "inherently governmental" work -- the standard by which that balance should be judged.

Increasing the proportion of federal employees in the FPS security force is one option that committee Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) is considering. "It's clear that the private contracting . . . has significant failures," he said in an interview. "It's clear to me that federal employees in the past have done a better job of securing federal buildings. When you start renting out security like the Federal Protective Service is doing, you potentially compromise a standard in law enforcement that can't be duplicated in the private sector."


CONTINUED     1        >

© 2009 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity