washingtonpost.com
Cervical cancer screening can wait till 21, group says

By Rob Stein
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, November 20, 2009

Women can delay having their first Pap test for cervical cancer until they turn 21 and many can wait longer to go back for follow-up screenings, according to new guidelines released Friday by a major medical group.

The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommended the change after concluding that more frequent testing did not catch significantly more cancers and often resulted in girls and young women experiencing unnecessary stress, anxiety and sometimes harmful treatments because of suspicious growths that would not cause problems.

"We really felt that the downsides of more frequent screening outweighed any benefits," said Alan G. Waxman, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of New Mexico who led the revision of the guidelines. "More testing is not always more intelligent testing."

The change comes amid sharp controversy over new recommendations from a federal task force that women wait until age 50 before they begin having routine mammograms and that women age 50 to 74 scale back to getting the exams routinely every two years.

Officials said the release of two sets of guidelines in the same week was coincidental, but the new cervical cancer screening recommendations could fuel the firestorm over mammograms, an issue that has become embroiled in the debate over health-care reform. The Obama administration distanced itself from the breast exam guidelines announced Monday by a federal task force, saying the panel does not set government policy or determine what services are covered by the government.

White House aides said the political team leading the fight to pass health-care reform first heard about the upcoming report -- which the panel approved in March -- in the past two weeks, and viewed it as one of many potential headaches that opponents could use to attack the reform efforts.

"There's something about health reform and guidelines that makes people think they're telling women to do less screening to save money," said Cindy Pearson of the National Women's Health Network, a Washington-based advocacy group. "But we don't have any concerns that women are being asked to give up something that is helpful. These recommendations are sound," she said.

Several experts said a backlash against those guidelines could be less likely because of a variety of factors: There is greater scientific agreement about the risks and benefits of cervical cancer testing than mammography, which involves a less common and less politically charged disease; the changes in the recommendations are less dramatic; and the guidelines were issued by a private medical group and not a government-appointed task force, they said.

"I can certainly understand why people are concerned about linking these -- it's clear we're going to have to carve billions out of the health-care system," said Thomas Herzog, chairman of gynecologic oncology at Columbia University New York Presbyterian Hospital, speaking on behalf of ACOG. "Where's the money going to come from? But in this case, if anything, we're taking money out of our own pockets."

The American Cancer Society, which has led the opposition to the mammography guidelines issued by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, was involved in the discussions leading up to the Pap test guidelines and will consider them in reevaluating its own recommendations, an official said.

"We are persuaded that the guidelines are really consistent with the evidence," said Robert Smith, the society's director of cancer screening.

The National Cervical Cancer Coalition, a patient advocacy group, endorsed the recommendations.

"The new ACOG practice guidelines appear consistent with where we have seen the science trending," said Alan Kaye, chairman of the coalition's board of directors.

Some members of the group, however, were less supportive.

"It seems a little bit of a week where women's health is taking a beating, considering the suggested guideline changes for mammography and all," Patricia Juirc, 37, a cervical cancer survivor from Mission Viejo, Calif., wrote in an e-mail. "Like they no longer want to be proactive and only see or treat us when we get sick."

Because cervical cancer is caused by a sexually transmitted virus known as the human papillomavirus (HPV), many medical groups had recommended that women start having annual Pap tests within three years of becoming sexually active.

Under the new guidelines, women can wait until they reach age 21 for their first test regardless of when they begin having sex, be screened only every other year until they turn 30 and then start having the test every three years if nothing concerning shows up on three consecutive tests. Those at increased risk, however, should continue to be screened more frequently, the group said.

The recommendations were based on evidence that while HPV is not unusual among sexually active girls and women, and abnormalities caused by the virus are common, those abnormalities often go away on their own and cervical cancer remains rare, especially at the youngest ages. Cervical cancer is also grows relatively slowly, so even if it does occur, waiting to catch it at age 21 would not pose a significant danger, the group concluded.

Staff reporter Michael D. Shear contributed to this report.

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2009 The Washington Post Company