Lack of safety features cited in copter crash

NTSB investigating medevac accident near Calif.-Nev. line

An investigator checks part of a medical helicopter that crashed Nov. 14 in California near the Nevada line, killing three crew members.
An investigator checks part of a medical helicopter that crashed Nov. 14 in California near the Nevada line, killing three crew members. (Marilyn Newton/associated Press)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, November 28, 2009

A medical helicopter that crashed this month in the dark hills north of Reno, Nev., killing three, lacked safety features recommended for years by federal experts, including night vision equipment and a system to warn the crew when the aircraft was too close to obstacles or the ground.

The Nov. 14 accident was the industry's second fatal crash this year and remains under investigation. But as was the case in this year's previous lethal accident, in South Carolina in September, the helicopter did not have equipment onboard that federal investigators have said probably can prevent crashes.

The pilot was flying by sight, and the helicopter was not equipped for instrument-guided flight. The helicopter also lacked an autopilot system, said Ted Lopatkiewicz, a spokesman for the National Transportation Safety Board. An autopilot can keep a helicopter level and on course even if the pilot becomes disoriented.

Lopatkiewicz was responding to questions from The Washington Post about the safety features.

The NTSB has urged medical helicopter programs to adopt those safety features, concluding that they could have helped prevent some accidents. Medical helicopters are permitted to operate without many of the safety features required on commercial airliners.

Killed in the crash were pilot James Bradshaw, 39, of Kapaa, Hawaii, and nurse Clinton Reger, 40, and paramedic Christopher Ritz, 37, both of Susanville, Calif. The helicopter went down in California near the Nevada line.

Last year was the deadliest yet for the $2.5 billion air ambulance industry, with 28 crew members and patients killed in seven helicopter accidents. Working on a medical helicopter has become one of the most dangerous jobs in the country, The Post reported in a series of articles published in August.

The helicopter that crashed Nov. 14, which was operated by Mountain Lifeflight, was returning to its base in Susanville about 2 a.m. after delivering a patient to Renown Medical Center in Reno. In 2002, a company pilot misjudged his altitude, became disoriented and flew a medical helicopter into a lake. The daytime accident killed him and injured two crew members.

Mountain Lifeflight operates at high altitudes where the weight of added equipment has a greater effect on lift and performance, said General Manager Brian Gray, explaining why the helicopter did not have some safety features. His company runs ground ambulances and airplane ambulances but had only one medical helicopter. The firm was in the market for a second helicopter before the crash, and is planning to include safety upgrades in its next copter, Gray said.

Gray said the company had been waiting for specific guidance from federal agencies before buying enhanced equipment. "We needed to see where the industry was going. It wasn't something we were willing to just dive into," Gray said. "There are a lot of neat toys, but you want an industry standard."

In keeping with other NTSB recommendations, Mountain Lifeflight tracks its flights by radio through a central dispatcher and requires pilots to use and file a written checklist assessing risks such as weather conditions before beginning a flight.

Gray said he was frustrated that the NTSB, which can only recommend improvements, and the Federal Aviation Administration, which regulates aviation, have not agreed on the features and procedures that should be required for medical helicopters. "I get the sense there is not a friendly relationship between those entities, and that ties up things," he said.

In September, the NTSB said insurance payments for air ambulance flights should be linked to safety, particularly federal Medicare reimbursements, which cover many of the trips. That recommendation followed years of statements listing equipment and procedures that the board said could reduce accidents.

After relying heavily on voluntary compliance and arguing against state regulation of medical helicopter flights, federal transportation officials have begun considering mandatory rules. But those probably would not be ready before 2011, FAA officials have said.

Meanwhile, Sen. Olympia J. Snowe (R-Maine) is promoting an amendment to health-care reform legislation that would require medevac helicopters to meet certain aviation, patient safety and quality standards to receive Medicare reimbursement. Opponents say the proposal would reduce service in some parts of the country.



More in the Maryland Section

Blog: Maryland Moment

Blog: Md. Politics

Washington Post staff writers provide breaking news coverage of your county and state government.

Neighborhoods

Neighborhoods

Use Neighborhoods to learn about Washington, D.C., Maryland and Virginia communities.

Md. Congressional Primary

Election Results

Obama and McCain swept the region on February 12.

FOLLOW METRO ON:
Facebook Twitter RSS
|
GET LOCAL ALERTS:
© 2009 The Washington Post Company