washingtonpost.com
Iranian official says decision to expand nuclear program is response to IAEA rebuke
10 uranium-enrichment sites announced after international rebuke

By Thomas Erdbrink
Washington Post Foreign Service
Monday, November 30, 2009 11:17 AM

TEHRAN -- A top Iranian nuclear official said Monday that the country's decision to build 10 more uranium-enrichment sites is a direct response to last week's censure by the International Atomic Energy Agency. The facilities will be built inside mountains, the official added, to secure them from military attack.

"We had no intention of building many facilities like the Natanz site," Ali Akbar Salehi told state radio, referring to an enrichment plant that was launched in the 1990s but is still not fully operational. "But apparently the West doesn't want to understand Iran's peaceful message."

The head of Iran's parliament, former nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani, accused Western nations of "haggling," "lying" and "cheating" during talks over Iran's nuclear program. Larijani also questioned the usefulness of the IAEA, the U.N. international watchdog agency, and the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which calls for curbing the spread of nuclear weapons but encourages member countries to share peaceful nuclear technology.

"If any country really wants to obtain nuclear energy, they should not try and obtain it though the IAEA and the NPT, because they won't do anything," Larijani said in a news conference. "The West is at a crossroad. Either they accept our nuclear program, or Iran will use its own capabilities."

In a sign of growing hostility toward the West, Iran's parliament on Sunday called on the government to reduce ties with the IAEA -- a move that could limit the agency's access to Iranian nuclear sites. Some parliamentarians suggested that Iran should leave the treaty all together, though analysts doubt that Iran would make such a move.

The plan to build 10 new enrichment sites was announced Sunday by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The move, which was broadly condemned in Europe, would constitute a dramatic expansion of Iran's nuclear program and would inevitably fuel fears that Iran is attempting to produce a nuclear weapon.

Russia, France and Germany said they were concerned about the expansion, which would violate four demands by the U.N. Security Council that Iran stop enriching uranium.

French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said Iran should be given a "last chance" in talks over its atomic program. His German counterpart, Guido Westerwelle, warned Iran that the patience of the international community is not endless. A Russian Foreign Ministry official said the country was "seriously concerned," Reuters news agency reported.

U.S. officials reacted cautiously to the announcement on Sunday. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said that Iran's plans, if carried out, "would be yet another serious violation of Iran's clear obligations under multiple U.N. Security Council resolutions and another example of Iran choosing to isolate itself."

Less than a year after President Obama pledged to engage Iran, U.S. efforts at rapprochement have yielded little in return, and relations between the sides now appear to be headed toward a more confrontational phase.

Ahmadinejad told the official Islamic Republic News Agency that construction of at least five nuclear facilities is to begin within two months.

The surprise announcement came two days after the IAEA's censure over the Islamic republic's refusal to stop enriching uranium, a key demand of Western powers. The 35-member board of the agency also criticized Iran's construction of a second enrichment plant near Qom, southwest of Tehran.

Iran insists that its nuclear program is designed for energy production and denies that it is seeking to build a nuclear bomb. In announcing plans for the new facilities on Sunday, Ahmadinejad said his country's need for energy will grow dramatically over the next 15 years.

"We annually must produce between 250 to 300 tons of nuclear fuel," he said.

The planned expansion of Iran's nuclear program is highly ambitious; if completed, it would give the country vastly more nuclear fuel. According to a November report by the IAEA, Iran has 8,745 centrifuges to enrich uranium, but fewer than half of them are operational. It would probably take years for Iran to accomplish this goal, making it more of a symbolic announcement than a practical one. The country has not brought its existing enrichment plant, at Natanz, to full scale even though construction began eight years ago, and the Qom facility still has no centrifuges.

The United States and its allies, under an IAEA-backed plan, recently sought to reduce Iran's nuclear stockpile by proposing that the Islamic republic ship most of its enriched uranium abroad to be fashioned into fuel for a research reactor. Iran has rejected a central element of that proposal, instead pointing toward a counterproposal that U.S. diplomats say is a non-starter.

The resolution passed by the IAEA on Friday, which censured Iran for a "breach of its obligation" under U.N. treaties, makes it even more unlikely that the country's leaders will seek a middle ground with the West.

"We are ready to be friendly and kind toward the whole world, but at the same time we won't allow the smallest violation of the rights of the Iranian nation," Ahmadinejad said Sunday.

Iran now voluntarily allows certain inspections, giving specified technical information and allowing permanent U.N. security cameras at its nuclear sites. Under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, it is not required to allow many checks by the U.N. nuclear agency.

Politicians, officials and senior clerics here expressed their dismay over Friday's reprimand by the IAEA, saying Iran has gone beyond its legal requirements to prove its good intentions and calling for reducing cooperation with the agency.

"We have options ranging from complete and full cooperation to leaving the Non-Proliferation Treaty on our table," said Kazem Jalali, spokesman for the parliament's national security and foreign policy committee. "But we believe that if the West reforms its path, we can still choose the full-cooperation option."

The parliament has made similar calls in the past to reduce cooperation with the IAEA, to no avail. It has, however, regularly managed to block an update to the Non-Proliferation Treaty that would widen the atomic watchdog's inspection capabilities.

Mashallah Shamsolvaezin, a journalist who is barred from working by the government and now advises at the Tehran-based Middle East Strategic Research Center, said both Iran and world powers, led by the United States, have little space to maneuver diplomatically. Iran, for its part, believes sanctions from the U.N. Security Council can be ignored.

"Iran's nuclear policy has always been about walking the tightrope at the edge of a cliff," he said. "But our leaders will never take actions that would jeopardize Iran's national security. For both parties, the only solution is negotiations."

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2009 The Washington Post Company