Post Politics
New home.
Still the best political coverage.
Page 2 of 2   <      

Senate health bill wouldn't increase insurance costs for most, CBO says

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity

Frequent fliers: The Treatment of Kenny Farnsworth -- For much of a decade, he called 911 routinely for an endless list of medical issues. Now he has an endless stack of bills he is unlikely to ever pay. So what's the diagnosis?

John L. Marshall: How health-care reform can cure cancer.

CBO: Senate health plan will increase some premiums -- Premiums would increase in the individual market, but purchasers would get better coverage than under current law.

Ezra Klein: Few surprises in health-care reform.

Federal Diary: A case study in abortion funding -- D.J. Feldman was 11 weeks pregnant when she learned that her child had a fatal fetal defect and decided on an abortion.

"This report alleviates a major concern that has been raised -- that insurance costs will go up across the board as a result of this legislation," Bayh said in a statement. "This study indicates that for most Americans, the bill will have a modestly positive impact on their premium costs. For the remainder, more will see their costs go down than up."

The CBO found that the measure would have its most dramatic impact on the individual market. Because they are not part of a workforce or other group that can pool its risk, consumers tend to pay more for policies with fewer benefits. The Senate bill would address that by establishing insurance exchanges, effectively creating risk pools. It would limit premiums based on age and medical condition, and cut costs for insurers by adding younger, healthier people to the customer base. All those provisions would lower premiums by as much as 20 percent, on average, by 2016, the CBO said.

For many people, those savings would be offset, however, by new standards for minimum coverage that would require newly offered policies to be significantly more generous than many are now. While people who currently have coverage would be permitted to keep it, the CBO predicts that few would choose to do so. As a result, for the 32 million people in the individual market, premiums would be 10 percent to 13 percent higher, on average, than under current law, climbing to $5,800 a year for individuals and $15,200 for family coverage.

However, six in 10 purchasers in that market would receive federal subsidies that would cover about two-thirds of the cost, the CBO said, so they would pay 60 percent less for insurance than if the legislation had not been enacted.

The benefits would be much less dramatic for the approximately 160 million people who receive coverage in the small and large group markets, the CBO said, leaving the average premium essentially unchanged or as much as 3 percent lower.

"This is not delivering huge premiums savings to the insured" in the short term, agreed Massachusetts Institute of Technology economist Jonathan Gruber, an advocate of reform. "But the flip side is that here's a bill that reduces the deficit, covers 30 million people and has the promise of lowering premiums in the long run."

Staff writer Shailagh Murray contributed to this report.


<       2

More in the Politics Section

Campaign Finance -- Presidential Race

2008 Fundraising

See who is giving to the '08 presidential candidates.

Latest Politics Blog Updates

© 2009 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity