Sen. Reid has recipe for getting health-care deal done

By Shailagh Murray
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, December 4, 2009

Of the Democratic senators who have set out to transform the nation's health-care system, one of the least likely is Majority Leader Harry M. Reid, whose legislative priorities typically fall more toward protecting the interests of his native Nevada.

Despite the prospect of a potentially tough 2010 reelection fight, the combative Democratic leader has assumed full ownership of a 2,074-page bill that would cost $848 billion over 10 years and institute the most far-reaching changes to the system in generations. As the Senate debate unfolds on the chamber floor, Reid has remained burrowed in his office, looking past the daily political drama playing out and, as he said recently, "getting my deals done."

When the debate over the economic stimulus program entered its final stretch earlier this year, Reid called on President Obama to act as salesman in chief for the legislation, closing every deal with high-voltage White House charm. Ten months later, as the president juggles a full slate of challenges, Reid has opted to confine health-care negotiations largely to the Senate chamber and his adjoining suite of offices, urging colleagues to negotiate compromises among themselves and to bring their concerns directly to him.

For Reid, success means emerging from the marathon debate with a bill backed by the 60 senators needed for final passage, something he hopes will come to pass as soon as late next week. Democrats' concerns will be addressed in individual amendments, but many others will be crowded into an omnibus "manager's amendment," a package Reid is expected to offer at the end of the process that will include many of the perks and fixes that members of his caucus are requesting.

As a longtime member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, where writing bills is done one favor at a time, Reid is hardly a stranger to deal-making. But he has been slow to tip his hand as he confronts uprisings from the left and right on major flashpoints, such as abortion coverage and a controversial public insurance plan.

"We're going to do our very utmost to complete health care before the end of the year," Reid, whose talents run more to vote-counting than oratory, told reporters on Thursday. The end is coming "soon," he said, whenever "we work out all the problems we have in the legislation."

As of late Thursday, the abortion issue remained the biggest point of contention. Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), who is among a handful of potential defections who could foil Reid in his quest for 60 votes, is expected to offer an amendment as soon as Friday that would ban abortion coverage in the Senate bill's scaled-back public plan. Nelson's measure would also prohibit people who receive tax credits for private health-care coverage from buying policies that include abortion services. Speaking to reporters Thursday morning, Nelson declared flatly that if his amendment fails," I won't vote to move [the bill] off the floor."

Other Democratic senators panicked as word spread of Nelson's filibuster threat. Reid shrugged off the statement. By noon Thursday, he had spoken three times to Nelson about the abortion issue and the public option. "I've always found him to be a reasonable person," Reid said. "He's trying to build coalitions on both of those, and we'll see what happens."

According to many Senate Democrats, Reid's game plan is to let Nelson's amendment to come to a vote, where it would presumably fail, allowing the leader to encourage immediate negotiations on alternative approaches. "There's always some value in seeing where people stand, then work toward a compromise," said a senior Senate Democrat involved in talks to resolve the abortion dispute.

Reid's wait-and-see approach has frustrated some liberal Democrats; they have grown impatient with the idea that the debate over a potentially historic health-care overhaul has essentially been hijacked by a handful of moderates, and fear that Reid is leaving too much to chance. But it appears to be yielding results on the public option, for months the major issue dividing moderate and progressive Democrats.

Four Democrats have announced that they would oppose the Senate bill as currently written, objecting to the inclusion of a public option. Reid had initially resisted including a government plan in the bill, but reversed himself after a revolt by his liberal colleagues, although with an opt-out clause for states that would not want to participate.

With the liberals in line, he then returned his attention to the four members of his caucus still on the outside: Nelson, Sens. Blanche Lincoln (Ark.) and Mary Landrieu (La.), and independent Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (Conn.). Although the four backed the procedural motion to allow the Senate debate to begin, they warned Reid that they could not support the public-option language in the long term.

CONTINUED     1        >

© 2009 The Washington Post Company