Kepler telescope discovers five new planets, all bigger than Earth

By Joel Achenbach
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 5, 2010; A03

In their search for a planet that looks like Earth -- comfortably bathed in sunshine in a pleasant solar system where life would be easy come easy go -- astronomers keep turning up the strangest things.

They've found a planet with the density of Styrofoam.

They've found two planets with surfaces hotter than molten lava.

They've found two inexplicable planet-sized objects that for some reason are hotter than the stars they orbit. Scientists have never seen anything like this before.

"Does anyone know what they are?" asked Harvard-Smithsonian astronomer David Latham, standing onstage in a ballroom of astronomers Monday at the Washington Marriott Wardman Park.

About 3,300 astronomers and students are in Washington for the annual winter meeting of the American Astronomical Society, where sessions range from why stars explode to how astronomers can find a job. The gathering's first day was dominated by news from Kepler, a new space telescope NASA launched in March on a mission to find Earth-like planets.

The very early results are tantalizing. Astronomers said they found five new planets, all much bigger than Earth. An additional 100 or so signals are being analyzed that might indicate planets. The new telescope has also revealed that the sun is not anomalously calm by galactic standards, which boosts the odds that other solar systems would be habitable.

William J. Borucki, Kepler's lead scientist, spent decades lobbying NASA to fund the mission. For much of Monday, he played his cards close to the vest, revealing only the five planets that popped up in the first six weeks of observations. Eight more months of data are still being analyzed, with the candidate planets being scrutinized by ground-based telescopes.

"There's a lot of real interesting stuff. That's all we can say now," said Simon "Pete" Worden, director of NASA's Ames Research Center. If an Earth-like planet were found, he noted, the president and Congress would be brought into the loop prior to a public announcement.

Latham, part of the Kepler team, teased, "You ain't seen nothin' yet."

A race is going on between American and European scientists to find the first "Earth" -- a planet that is about its size and simultaneously in the "habitable zone" of a star. In the habitable zone, a planet would be in the Goldilocks position, neither too hot nor too cold, and just right for water to be liquid at the surface.

Many scientists interested in the idea of extraterrestrial life have been excited by the discovery of hundreds of "exoplanets" beyond Earth's solar system. There is also evidence that complex molecules of the type necessary for life are abundant in the universe. But what's also clear is that the universe has a lot of ways to construct solar systems. When it comes to planets, eccentricity may be the norm.

"The universe is more bizarre than our imaginations can conceive," said NASA astrophysics chief Jon Morse.

Said Latham: "If the universe is tuned for life as we know it, why did it bother to make all these weird planets?" His conclusion: "Nature is prolific. Nature will try anything it can."

Although about 400 planets have been found since the first was discovered in 1995 by a Swiss-led astronomical team, none has been terribly promising at first glance as a potential abode for life. Most are "hot Jupiters," jumbo objects in tight orbits around the star, so close that their gravity jerks the star to and fro and causes a wobble in the starlight as seen from telescopes on Earth.

But Kepler uses a different technique, one that measures the slight dimming of starlight as a planet passes in front of the star. This method allows astronomers not only to detect the planet but also estimate its size and density. The telescope, which is in an Earth-trailing orbit around the sun, was designed to look at about 150,000 stars in the galaxy in a patch of sky just above the galactic plane and near the constellation Cygnus.

The search requires serendipity as well as precision. Most planets, particularly the small, rocky bodies such as Earth that orbit fairly far from the star, won't be properly aligned to transit the face of the star as seen from Kepler's vantage point. But scientists can estimate the probability of seeing a planet of a particular size in a particular type of orbit. Any discoveries can then be extrapolated statistically; a few "Earths" found by Kepler would mean that many more exist.

"Right now, we're still taking the inventory of the universe. That inventory is largely complete with regard to stars. It is in its infancy with regard to planets," said Neil deGrasse Tyson, an astronomer at the American Museum of Natural History.

Kepler does more than find planets: The telescope is revealing secrets of stars more generally. One finding is that the sun is not anomalously serene in the galactic scheme of things. Some theorists had argued that life in other solar systems might be rare because most stars might be a lot crankier and less stable than the sun. Kepler's data suggest otherwise.

"We know that sun-like twins abound," said Natalie Batalha, a Kepler team member and astronomer at San Jose State University.

Astronomer Catherine Pilachowski of Indiana University said that the relative calm of most stars in the galaxy is good news for earthlings: "I'm going to sleep better tonight knowing that -- that we're in a good, safe place."

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

© 2010 The Washington Post Company