washingtonpost.com
What the Supreme Court struck down and kept in place with campaign finance ruling

Thursday, January 21, 2010; 1:01 PM

The Supreme Court's ruling Thursday overturned a ban on corporate contributions to election campaigns but upheld other requirements. What's out -- and still in:

What's out

-- A 63-year-old prohibition on corporations using money from their general treasuries to produce and run their own campaign ads.

-- A prohibition contained in the McCain-Feingold Act that bars issue-oriented ads paid for by corporations or unions 30 days before a primary and 60 days before a general election.

Still in

-- A century-old ban on donations by corporations from their treasuries directly to candidates.

-- The requirement that any corporation spending more than $10,000 in a year to produce or air a campaign ad covered by federal restrictions must file a report with the Federal Election Commission, revealing the names and addresses of anyone who contributed $1,000 or more to the ad's preparation or distribution.

-- The requirement that an ad include a disclaimer stating who is responsible for it, if the ad is not authorized by a candidate or political committee.

-- Karen Yourish

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2010 The Washington Post Company