Fed Page   |  Column Archive  |    RSS   |   Daily Politics Q&A

Obama ponders 'holds' and 'recess appointments' as Sen. Scott Brown arrives

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Al Kamen
Friday, February 5, 2010

In the pre-Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) days, officials in President Obama's administration batted away any inquiries about possible recess appointments of controversial administration nominees with the phrase "health-care reform first." No feather-ruffling of any senator before passage, they said -- need every vote.

But now that major health-care reform is pretty much toast, the question is back, especially now, with a recess coming up next week on Presidents' Day weekend.

Obama is the only president in the past three decades who has not used his recess-appointment authority by this point in his term. On the other hand, recent presidents, with the exception of Ronald Reagan, have used the authority sparingly in their first year, perhaps in part because it often takes some months to figure out whether it might yet be possible to get a nominee confirmed to a full-term job.

There may be another reason. As Loop Fans know, under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, anyone tapped over the coming recess could serve nearly two years -- until the end of the next session of Congress, essentially the end of 2011. But if Obama had recess-appointed someone, say, over the Thanksgiving break, that person could have served only through the 2010 session.

Bill Clinton exercised the prerogative once in his first 13 months. Jimmy Carter and George Bushes I and II recessed only a handful of appointees, many to part-time boards and such. Reagan had 38 recess appointees his first year, again mostly to part-time posts.

Obama, who used a few "holds" himself when he was a senator, chastised Republicans on Wednesday for using that maneuver to block so many of his nominees for reasons unrelated to their qualifications.

Stay tuned.

Good to the Corps

The Peace Corps on Thursday announced its annual rankings of colleges and universities sending it the most overseas volunteers, and George Washington University, for the second year in a row, came in first among medium-size schools -- 5,000 to 15,000 undergrads -- with 53 undergraduate alumni now serving. GW barely edged out American University (51 volunteers), followed by Cornell University (46), Miami University (43), and the College of William and Mary (40). Georgetown tied for eighth with 30 volunteers.

The University of Washington ranked first among large schools, with 101 undergrad alums now serving as volunteers. It was followed by the University of Colorado at Boulder (95), the University of California at Berkeley (89), Michigan State University (86) and the University of Florida (79).

For small schools (under 5,000 students), St. Olaf College led the group with 26 volunteers, followed by the University of Mary Washington (23) and Middlebury College (21). Tied for fourth were the University of Portland, the University of Puget Sound and Williams College (20 each). St. Mary's College of Maryland tied for seventh with 19 volunteers. Johns Hopkins University had 15.

The all-time leader for sending volunteers since the agency began in 1961 remained UC-Berkeley, with 3,412 volunteers, followed by the University of Wisconsin at Madison (2,906), the University of Washington (2,614), the University of Michigan (2,331) and the University of Colorado at Boulder (2,206).

The rankings for the top 25 schools in each size category can be found at http://multimedia.peacecorps.gov/multimedia/pdf/stats/schools2010.pdf.


CONTINUED     1        >

© 2010 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity