New vote counting procedure for Best Picture Oscar is hard to follow

Chris Rock
Chris Rock (Danny Feld/Associated Press)
  Enlarge Photo    

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Steven Zeitchik
Sunday, February 7, 2010

This year, the Oscars are using a preferential voting system to determine the winner in the Best Picture category on March 7. Although attempting to understand the system can seem like trying to divine the secrets of cold fusion, the process is actually logical -- sort of.

Whereas all other categories will use the same system used in the past -- every voter gets to pick one of the five nominees, and the nominee with the most votes wins -- the 10-nominee Best Picture category will function differently.

Voters will be asked to rank their choices from 1 to 10 (though they are not required to complete the ballot in full). Then the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences will gather up the ballots and separate them in piles according to voters' first choices. Each movie gets its own pile -- the film that appears most frequently as a first-place choice will naturally have the largest stack, the movie with the next-most first-place votes will have the second-largest, and so forth. Then each stack is counted.

If one film has more than 50 percent of the votes on the first round (unlikely), it will be declared the winner. If it doesn't, the academy will take the shortest stack -- the movie that got the fewest first-place votes -- eliminate it from contention, remove its from the table and redistribute those voters' second choices to all the other stacks.

The tally then begins again: If a film now has passed 50 percent of the ballots (still pretty unlikely), it wins. If it doesn't, the auditors go to the smallest stack left, eliminate that movie, remove that stack, and go down those ballots to voters' next-highest choice (of a movie that remains in contention, of course), and redistribute the ballots across the piles once again. The process repeats until one stack ends up with a majority.

What all this means in practical terms -- apart from a lot of slips of paper -- is that, because it's unlikely that auditors will work their way past most voters' fourth or fifth choices before arriving at a winner, it actually could be preferable for a film to garner a lot of second- and third-place votes than to be a polarizing choice that splits evenly between first-place votes and, say, eighth- and ninth-place on the ballot.

That, in turn, means a movie could pull a Bush v. Gore -- win Best Picture despite not getting the most first-place votes. But because the Academy guarantees a secret ballot, few people would ever know.

-- Los Angeles Times


More From Style

[Click Track]

Blogs

Style writers riff on pop music, comics and other topics.

[advice]

Advice

Get words of wisdom from Carolyn Hax, Ask Amy, Miss Manners and more.

[Reliable Source]

Reliable Source

Columnists Amy Argetsinger and Roxanne Roberts dish dirt on D.C.

© 2010 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity