» This Story:Read +| Comments
Fed Page   |   E-Mail Newsletter  Fed Insider E-Mail   |    RSS   |   Column Archive

Federal Diary: White House, Congress resist Postal Service goal of cutting delivery days

Postmaster General John E. Potter said the Postal Service needs a "fundamental structural change."
Postmaster General John E. Potter said the Postal Service needs a "fundamental structural change." (Haraz N. Ghanbari/associated Press)

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Joe Davidson
Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Mail volume in the United States has fallen off a cliff in recent years. It has dropped so sharply that U.S. Postal Service officials have pleaded with Congress to allow a cut in delivery days from six to five.

This Story

It's been a hard sell. Politicians are reluctant. Although polling data show that the public is willing to accept five-day delivery, people who count on votes for their livelihood are not at all eager to cut back on a service so basic, so trusted and so needed as the U.S. mail.

Count President Obama among that number.

His proposed budget for fiscal year 2011 states flatly "that 6-day delivery and rural delivery of mail shall continue."

The Postal Service is in a tricky situation: Its operations are not funded through tax dollars, but by the products and services it sells. Yet it needs congressional approval to make certain changes in how it does business. That includes the number of delivery days and the way the USPS funds retiree benefits, which we'll get to in a minute.

The budget does include, and Congress must approve, funding for free mail for the blind and for overseas absentee-balloting materials. Obama's spending plan essentially says the Postal Service won't get that money, almost $75 million, if it stops delivering mail six days a week (apparently not counting last week in my neighborhood).

Postal officials are not deterred. "The language in the president's budget on six-day [delivery] is boilerplate" that has been in every president's budget since the mid-1980s, said Gerald J. McKiernan, a spokesman for the Postal Service. "The White House is aware of our interest in a five-day plan, and we have discussed it with them."

More discussion, if not begging, will be needed before the White House and Congress are convinced that five-day delivery is the strong, albeit distasteful, medicine that the ailing postal operation needs.

A few months ago, the Government Accountability Office declared the Postal Service's financial situation at "high-risk." The length and severity of the recession have hit USPS hard. The number of pieces of mail it delivers dropped by an astounding 26 billion, to 177 billion, from fiscal 2008 to 2009. At the same time, the number of delivery points has steadily increased and the number of USPS employees has steadily declined.

Postmaster General John E. Potter told a Senate panel in August that the consequences of the recession "have been so severe that only a fundamental structural change will make it possible for the Postal Service to overcome costs that are insurmountable under our current business model."

He added: "In considering the structural changes that can produce the level of results that are necessary, we have concluded that reducing the frequency of mail delivery from six to five days a week can provide the financial relief that is necessary to restore the fiscal health of the Postal Service."

Congress did provide limited breathing room last year with legislation allowing postal officials to restructure the 2009 payment they are obligated to make to prefund retiree health benefits. Potter was happy with that, but he really wanted longer-lasting relief.


CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +| Comments
© 2010 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity