|Page 2 of 2 <|
Democrats more hopeful on health-care vote
As Pelosi and her leadership team scoured the Democratic caucus for votes this week, they confronted smaller problems. Obama's leverage could be critical to wooing Democrats whose problems with the Senate bill are serious but narrow, and those are unlikely to be addressed in the package of fixes.
Rep. Luis V. Gutierrez (D-Ill.) said he would vote against the health-care bill if it contains provisions barring undocumented workers from buying insurance in government exchanges, even with their own money. "As it stands, I'm not going to vote for it. And they know that," he said.
Gutierrez was among a group of black and Hispanic lawmakers who met Thursday with Obama at the White House. Gutierrez said the meeting left him "hopeful that the president can take steps that would garner my support for this health-care proposal."
Democratic members of the House Ways and Means Committee have raised concerns about an independent Medicare commission that the Senate bill would establish, arguing that it would usurp congressional authority over Medicare spending. Rep. Richard E. Neal (D-Mass.), a senior Ways and Means member, has threatened to vote against the Senate bill unless Congress's control over Medicare hospital reimbursements is fully retained.
Rep. Michael E. Capuano (D-Mass.) outlined his objections on Thursday in a lengthy letter to supporters. Capuano, who, like Neal, voted for a House health-care bill in November, said he fears that Senate cost-saving measures could cost Massachusetts billions of dollars in Medicare and Medicaid funding.
Rep. Robert E. Andrews (D-N.J.), recruited by House leaders to help sell the legislation, said Obama's decision to delay his trip would help keep wavering lawmakers focused on the big picture: passing the most significant overhaul of the nation's health-care system in decades.
"We need him to do what he's done really well the last couple weeks, which is to go out and explain to the public what the stakes are. Be available to our members to reiterate the case for them," Andrews said.
House leaders hope to receive a final cost estimate for the reconciliation package by Monday and said they would then post the text online. Pelosi has pledged to give lawmakers and the public at least 72 hours to study it before the House votes on it; that clock will start ticking when the measure is made public, aides said.
Among those studying the details most closely will be senators of both parties, who plan to immediately begin seeking the guidance of Alan Frumin, the Senate parliamentarian.
Frumin is the arbiter of whether the reconciliation package will pass muster under Senate rules that limit its contents to provisions that affect the budget. Frumin's opinion carries no weight in the House, but it will carry considerable influence if the measure reaches the Senate.
Meanwhile, the machinery of the reconciliation process will grind into action Monday afternoon, when the House Budget Committee is scheduled to cast the first vote on the fixes package. It would then go to the House Rules Committee, where the final legislation will be assembled. Aides said that process will probably take place Thursday, with a vote on the House floor possible that day but more likely on Friday or Saturday.
Senate Republicans have secured a preliminary ruling from Frumin that appears to limit Pelosi's options for bringing the Senate bill and the fixes package to the floor. Democratic leaders had considered combining the measures, so that members who don't like the Senate bill could avoid a vote on it. But a reconciliation bill cannot make changes to legislation that has yet to become law, Frumin said.
"I know the other side's been playing around with all things they might somehow be able to do," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) told reporters. "That isn't going to be one of them."
Pelosi shrugged off the ruling, accepting that the Senate bill would have to move first, and independently. "It isn't going to make any difference except maybe the mood that people are in," she said Friday. "The fact is that once we pass it in the House, it's going to be the law of the land."
Staff writer Michael D. Shear contributed to this report.