washingtonpost.com
Tiger Woods television interviews leave questions unasked, unanswered

By Leonard Shapiro
Monday, March 22, 2010; 1:45 PM

So many questions, and still so few answers.

A day later, that was the lingering impression after watching Tiger Woods, as always still in total control mode, made himself available to ESPN and the Golf Channel for a pair of five-minute interviews that were embargoed until 7:30 p.m. Sunday and aired simultaneously.

ESPN's Tom Rinaldi and the Golf Channel's Kelly Tilghman drew the assignments for their respective networks, and each managed to ask 21 almost breathless, rat-a-tat questions of the world's No. 1 golfer (and reigning philanderer of the year) about the events that have transpired since the Nov. 27 car crash outside his home in Orlando.

CBS Sports, which televises the Masters, his first event since the accident, also was offered a five-minute shot with Woods, but chose not to accept, citing the five-minute limit as being unacceptable. All three outlets were contacted by the Woods camp late in the day on Friday and the interviews conducted Sunday afternoon at the Isleworth Country Club near his home.

The 7:30 p.m. embargo was set ostensibly to avoid any conflict with the final round of the Transitions tournament on the PGA Tour. Those plans went awry when rain delays earlier in the day pushed back the finishing time, and both interviews aired at the same time Jim Furyk, one of Woods's best friends on the tour, was scrambling to secure his first victory in three years.

The Golf Channel's choice of Tilghman to conduct its interview was questionable, at best. In January 2008, she nearly lost her job as the first female shot-by-shot golf announcer. Following an on-air joke by partner Nick Faldo that young players on the tour ought to "gang up" on Woods trying to catch him, she added, clearly in jest, or "lynch him in a back alley." That comment, at the 2008 season-opening Mercedes in Hawaii, created a firestorm of controversy and resulted in her two-week suspension.

At the time, Tilghman called Woods, who she described as a good friend, and apologized for her comment, and Woods said he was satisfied with that response. According to the Golf Channel's website biography of Tilghman, she has since appeared as a play-by-place voice on Woods's highly popular video games, Tiger Woods PGA Tour '09 and '10, produced by EA Sports, one of his main sponsors.

Journalism 101 tells you that friends really should not be interviewing friends, or that broadcasters performing as journalists should not be handling interviews with people with whom they have a business relationship. Then again, the Golf Channel's journalistic standards often have been laughable, and while Tilghman did ask some of the obvious semi-tough questions, another choice of interviewers -- perhaps Jim Gray or Scott Walker, among others on the network's roster -- would have been far more appropriate.

Dan Higgins, a Golf Channel spokesman, said Woods had no say in who would conduct the interview, and that the Golf Channel, which followed the ESPN session, had pressed for more time for the interview, to no avail.

"It was our choice," he said of Tilghman conducting the interview. "The fact that she's been dealing with him for 15 years was a factor. There certainly was a comfort factor involved in the decision."

To her credit, Tilghman did provide about the only real news of the day. After the interview aired, she said that Ari Fleisher, former White House press secretary under President George W. Bush whose public relations firm had been retained by Woods, was no longer advising the player. His presence, she said, had become too much of a story in its own right.

Rinaldi, a long-time on-air reporter at CNN and ESPN, had no conflicts of interest. When interviewed after the session on SportsCenter about whether he thought Woods had been sincere, he chose not to go there, saying he would prefer to let viewers make that judgment for themselves. Good for him.

Late in his session, he also asked one of the more provocative questions among the 42 directed at Woods.

"I ask this question respectfully and but of course at a distance from your family life. When you look at it now, why did you get married?"

"Why," Woods said. "Because I loved her. I loved Elin with everything I have. And that's something that makes me feel even worse. That I did this to someone I love that much."

Tilghman's best effort?

"You went from being recognized as the greatest golfer in the world to becoming a punch line. How does that make you feel?"

"It was hurtful," Woods said. "But then again, you know what, I did it. I'm the one who did those things and looking back on it now with a more clear head, I get it. I can understand why people will say these things because you know, it was disgusting behavior. As a person it's hard to believe that was me, looking back on it now."

What was left out? Neither interviewer brought up his relationship with Anthony Galea, a Canadian doctor under investigation by federal authorities for prescribing steroids and human growth hormone to athletes. He was never asked about reports that he was using the pain-killer Vicodin and the sleeping pill Ambien the night of the accident. Nor was he asked why he was unwilling to speak with the Florida Highway Patrol in its aftermath.

Woods clearly had pre-set talking points, insisting to both interviewers that what happened on Thanksgiving night was a private matter between he and his wife, and that details of the accident are "all in the police report."

Not really, but neither interviewer, obviously hearing the clock tick-tock-ticking, followed up.

Tilghman did take time at the end of her five minutes to ask Woods about the white bracelet on his wrist.

"It's Buddhist," he said. "It's for protection and strength, and I certainly need that."

Next stop on the Woods' Mea Culpa Express is likely to be at Augusta National in three weeks, where it has yet to be determined if he will grant his usual early-week interview in the media room. Let's hope so. Five minutes will not be enough. So many questions still, and so few answers.

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2010 The Washington Post Company