A Masters win would be too much too soon for Tiger Woods

Video
Nike has unveiled a new commercial featuring Tiger Woods and the voice of his deceased father, Earl Woods, using recordings that appear as though he is addressing his son about his recent sex scandal.

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Thomas Boswell
Thursday, April 8, 2010

AUGUSTA, GA. -- If Tiger Woods wins the Masters on Sunday after all the damage he's done to golf, I plan to rob a bank on Monday; maybe then I'll win a Pulitzer Prize.

Sin big and win big. Why don't most of us ever think of that strategy? This week, within a minute, Woods talked about the "horrible" things he's done and how he thinks he can win the Masters. Has the thought crossed his mind that he doesn't deserve to win?

We know that bad things happen to good people. We cope with it. But when great things happen to people who have acted badly, especially if the bonanza comes fast and arrives ringed with robes of glory, don't we have to draw the line? I'm forgiving, but my brain hasn't turned into pimento cheese. If Woods has a tap-in to win the Masters, I hope his conscience helps him yip it and lip it. Win any other week. But not here. Not now.

Many here are fascinated, though a bit unsettled, at the cheers and calls of "Lets Go, Tiger," that have greeted Woods at Augusta National. Can it, should it, be that easy?

"I didn't know what to expect. The galleries couldn't be nicer. It was just incredible. The encouragement I got, it blew me away to be honest with you," Woods said after his first practice round Monday. "Just something that really touched my heart pretty good."

The Masters' graciousness toward Woods is appropriate. But how will we feel by Sunday? Chances are, we'll probably have to digest the possibility of a Woods win.

Once great champs establish themselves here in their prime, you rarely get rid of them no matter what injury or slump befalls them before they arrive. When they were Woods's age, Arnold Palmer, Jack Nicklaus and Tom Watson were in streaks where they were fourth or better, respectively, in eight-of-10, eight-of-nine and six-of-seven years. Woods's case is more extreme. But he's been top three here five-of-the-last six years.

If Tiger can putt well, regardless of the state of the rest of his game, he'll probably be in the top five on the leader board at some point. What do you yell then?

Everyone, right up to Masters chairman Billy Payne, clearly feels the dizzying ambiguity of Woods's return. As Payne put it Wednesday, Woods forgot that "with fame and fortune comes responsibility, not invisibility."

"It is not simply the degree of his conduct that is so egregious here; it is the fact that he disappointed all of us, and more importantly, our kids and our grandkids," Payne said. "Our hero did not live up to the expectations of the role model we saw for our children.

"Is there a way forward? I hope yes. I think yes. But certainly his future will never again be measured only by his performance against par, but measured by the sincerity of his efforts to change."

As this week unfolds, we may reach an odd consensus. Few want to see Woods collapse and miss the cut. Hasn't he been mortified enough? Infidelity isn't a capital offense. It isn't even against the law. Leading a double life has to be worse for the person doing it, once it blows up, than it is for all of us who got fooled.


CONTINUED     1        >

© 2010 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity