washingtonpost.com
Credit-rating agencies were lax, Senate probe finds

By Zachary A. Goldfarb
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, April 23, 2010; A17

A probe of the credit-rating industry by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations found that firms used outdated models, were influenced by their clients and waited too long to downgrade investments as the collapse in the housing market intensified in the year before the financial crisis.

The probe shows that some employees at the credit-rating companies were hungry for fees and apparently willing to compromise objective analysis of the quality of investments, according to material released Thursday.

One e-mail suggests that a Moody's employee explicitly agreed to negotiate ratings for investments based on a promise of future fees.

"We have spent significant amount of resource on this deal and it will be difficult for us to continue with this process if we do not have an agreement on the fee issue," the Moody's employee wrote to Merrill Lynch in June 2007. "We are agreeing to this under the assumption that this will not be a precedent for any future deals and that you will work with us further on this transaction to try to get to some middle ground with respect to the ratings."

The committee is holding a hearing Friday and has invited top executives from Moody's, Standard & Poors and Fitch Ratings.

"Investors trusted credit-rating agencies to issue accurate and impartial credit ratings, but that trust was broken in the recent financial crisis," said Carl M. Levin (D-Mich.), chairman of the subcommittee. "A conveyor belt of high-risk securities, backed by toxic mortgages, got AAA ratings that turned out not to be worth the paper they were printed on."

The investigation touches on complex securities issued by Goldman Sachs, finding that the firm sometimes pushed back when rating agencies cast doubt on the investments.

A Moody's analyst wrote in April 2006 about getting "serious pushback from Goldman on a deal that they want to go to market with today." An S&P analyst in May 2006 referenced "a known flaw . . . in pretty much all Abacus trades." Abacus, a complex mortgage-related investment, is the subject of a federal fraud suit against Goldman Sachs.

S&P spokesman Chris Atkins said the firm has "learned some important lessons from the recent crisis and . . . made a number of significant enhancements to increase the transparency, governance and quality of our ratings."

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2010 The Washington Post Company