Hot Topic Baseball Insider
Ryan Howard deal will weaken Philadelphia Phillies in the long run
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Blog excerpt from washingtonpost.com/baseballinsider
The surest way to destroy a perennial champion in baseball is from the inside. A great franchise can get fooled by its own success into thinking it can do no wrong. It reacts to success by dishing out cushy contracts to its core members (locking them up well beyond the point where they can be expected to remain productive) and reacts to failure by overspending on outsiders.
The result is a bloated, inflexible roster that handcuffs the team in future seasons, leaving it incapable of quick-fix solutions to intractable problems. All it can do is wait until all those contracts expire and endure the inevitable decline. This is precisely what happened to the Orioles in the late 1990s (with Albert Belle, Scott Erickson, Brady Anderson, et al.) and the Yankees in the middle part of the 2000s, and it is what's happening to teams such as the Cubs and Astros right now.
By contrast, the Phillies were in a fairly enviable position. Coming off back-to-back National League pennants, and with the makings of another champion in 2010, they had their core locked up in long-term deals -- but mostly smart contracts that would expire at just the right time for the team to retain its precious flexibility.
That is what makes the Phillies' signing of Ryan Howard to a five-year, $125 million contract extension on Monday so puzzling. The deal tethers the Phillies to a lumbering first baseman through his mid-30s, when players almost inevitably suffer significant declines in production.
For argument's sake, let's give the Phillies the benefit of the doubt. Howard, 30, has been a model superstar, combining consistency and durability (at least 144 games played in each of the previous four seasons) with unmatched power (an average of 50 homers and 143 RBI in those same four seasons). He has shown a willingness to work on weaknesses -- losing weight and improving his defense during the past couple of seasons -- and he has an impeccable reputation off the field.
There are still plenty of reasons why the move was ill-conceived:
1. For $25 million a year (only Alex Rodriguez has a higher AAV, or average annual value) you should expect a flawless player. But Howard is far from flawless. He remains susceptible to left-handed pitching and breaking balls. And he is still just average with the glove.
2. There was little incentive to make the deal now. Howard was already signed through 2011, and the Phillies could have used the next two years to get a better gauge on how Howard aged through his early 30s.
3. First base is a particularly easy position to fill. Albert Pujols, Prince Fielder, Adrian Gonzalez and Lance Berkman all reach free agency after 2011. Want to spend your money at a more premium position (such as shortstop) and sign a stop-gap at first base? No commodity in baseball is more freely available.
Inevitably, the pundits have singled out Pujols and Fielder as the big winners in the Howard deal -- as their market prices just went way up.
But I'll add another group of winners: the other four teams in the NL East. None have shown any ability to stop the Phillies' run atop the division. But with the Howard move, the Phillies are showing an ability to do it themselves.