» This Story:Read +| Comments
Fed Page   |   E-Mail Newsletter  Fed Insider E-Mail   |    RSS   |   Column Archive

The Potty Parity Act, a bill to even out toilets at men's and ladies' rooms

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Joe Davidson
Thursday, May 13, 2010

Vivian Y. Bright likes to watch her congressman at work, but she was glad when Rep. Edolphus Towns finally gaveled to a close a hearing on sexual disparity in federal restrooms -- because she had to find one.

This Story

"Just now, we experienced it," she said. "We went to the ladies room. There's a line."

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which Towns (D-N.Y.) chairs, heard testimony Wednesday on legislation to develop a more equitable sexual balance in the number of toilets in federal buildings.

Nicknamed the Potty Parity Act, the Towns bill would require the number of toilets available for women to equal or exceed the number of toilets and urinals in men's restrooms. The requirement would apply to future federal building construction and to properties undergoing major renovations.

"I am certain that every woman in this room has frequently experienced the inconvenience, as well as the discomfort, caused by an insufficient number of women's restroom facilities," Towns said to a hearing room nearly filled with his supporters, mostly women, from his Brooklyn district. Bright is president of Towns's Women's Caucus, which had about 90 members at the hearing.

Although potty parity can easily turn into sophomoric humor, it's really a serious matter.

Clothing styles, biology and the need to use stalls are all reasons women need more time, said Rep. Stephen Cohen (D-Tenn.). Waiting too long, he added, can lead to abdominal pain, cystitis and urinary-tract infections.

Kathryn H. Anthony, an architecture professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, said being forced to wait in line for restrooms is a form of gender bias. Having too few female facilities reflects male dominance. The buildings were designed and built by men apparently indifferent to the additional needs of women, she said.

"Until recently, most architects, contractors, engineers, building-code officials and clients were not concerned about this issue," Anthony said. "They rarely contacted women about their restroom needs; women were rarely employed in these male-dominated professions, nor were they in a position to effect change."

Being an academic, Anthony came prepared with much information about restroom visits: six to eight times a day, up to 2,920 times a year for the average person. "By age 80," she noted, we will have "spent two years of our life in restrooms."

Yet it's also true that there doesn't seem to be an undersupply of water closets for females during the average day in a federal office building. "It's not an issue under our normal work hours," Janet Kopenhaver, the Washington representative of Federally Employed Women, said during a telephone interview.

The General Services Administration generally does not get complaints about the lack of facilities for women in office buildings, according to Robert A. Peck, GSA's public buildings commissioner. Restroom usage spreads out over the course of the day, he said.


CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +| Comments
© 2010 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity