» This Story:Read +| Comments
Post Politics
New home.
Still the best political coverage.

Senate bill brings new powers, new pressures for Fed

Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, at the China-U.S. Strategic and Economic Dialogue in Beijing, is set to gain broad authority over Wall Street.
Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, at the China-U.S. Strategic and Economic Dialogue in Beijing, is set to gain broad authority over Wall Street. (Saul Loeb/associated Press)

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Neil Irwin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, May 25, 2010

The Federal Reserve, a target of bipartisan bashing during the past two years, has emerged a big winner in the financial overhaul passed by the Senate, but the broader powers granted by the legislation expose the central bank to new risks.

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

The Senate bill represents a remarkable turnaround for the Fed. Many on Capitol Hill had wanted to punish the central bank for failing to prevent the financial crisis. An earlier version would have stripped the Fed of responsibility for overseeing most of the nation's banks, and there was strong support in both houses of Congress for audits of the Fed's monetary policy decisions.

Neither of those provisions made it into the legislation approved last week, and the central bank is set to gain broad authority to oversee Wall Street.

The new powers, however, could be a mixed blessing for Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and his successors. The central bank will have its credibility on the line when the next crisis arises and could be more exposed to political pressures because of its broader reach.

Firming up mission

The exact impact of the far-reaching Senate legislation on the Fed is hard to predict, and it will change further as the Senate bill is reconciled with the House version passed last year. But the final bill will clearly reinforce the primacy of the Fed in preventing financial firms from taking risks that endanger the U.S. economy as a whole.

Under both bills, Fed leaders would identify firms whose size, complexity or interconnectedness makes them in need of extra oversight and, if a newly established council of financial regulators agreed, the Fed would begin supervising those companies. When a large, complex financial firm is on the verge of failure, the central bank would play a role in shutting it down, outside the bankruptcy process.

The Fed's long-standing official mission has been to ensure maximum employment and stable prices. In practice, the Fed has also made the pursuit of a stable financial system a goal; it was founded as a response to the financial panic of 1907.

But the legislation, people inside and outside the Fed acknowledge, would make stabilizing the financial system more explicitly a part of the central bank's mission. The open question is whether it would give the Fed the power it needs to meet that responsibility. As the past decade has shown, Fed officials have had plenty of blind spots and shown lack of foresight. And even if the central bank's leaders did their jobs perfectly, financial crises have existed for as long as capitalism has, and no legislation is likely to prevent them entirely.

All of which leaves the Fed's credibility exposed the next time the financial system shudders -- and central banks rely on their credibility to instill confidence in the economy.

"This has the potential to be pretty dangerous for the Fed," said Anil Kashyap, an economist at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. "It seems to me the Fed could be left with the appearance that it's in charge of everything, but in fact not really be in charge."

Indeed, the Fed won't have its success entirely within its own hands. Both the House and Senate versions of financial regulation overhaul give a major role to a nine-member Financial Stability Oversight Council, which is to help determine where risks in the financial system lie.

While the Fed failed to identify the risks that a housing bubble posed for the financial system during the past decade, Fed officials argued early on that regional banks were becoming excessively exposed to commercial real estate and thought that other regulators were dragging their heels in developing a joint effort to address the problem.

CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +| Comments

More in the Politics Section

Campaign Finance -- Presidential Race

2008 Fundraising

See who is giving to the '08 presidential candidates.

Latest Politics Blog Updates

© 2010 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity