washingtonpost.com
Unplugged: In week without Internet, he didn't miss much

By J. Freedom du Lac
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, May 28, 2010; C01

I realized that I don't particularly care about what I don't know.

For instance, this tweet: "About to watch film on The Doors on PBS by Tom 'Living in Oblivion' DiCillo, even though I stopped loving them after 1st album."

And this: "Found: black Merona sweater vest (size small) in the hallway between the women's restroom and the kitchen on the fourth floor," as someone wrote on The Post's internal messaging system while I was offline for 114 hours last week.

The Internet is like a faucet that's always running full-out, saturating my brain with news, gossip, gripes, japes, bootlegged Prince videos, status updates, ranked lists, baseball scores, Josh Ritter songs, http://funnyordie.com videos and long-form stories about everything from the guy who made a fortune on credit-default swaps to the roots of fantasy baseball.

The flood is hardly overwhelming -- no information-overload rant here -- but it's not exactly necessary, either. After the experiment ended, I went back to see what I'd missed. I received 450 e-mails (not counting spam), along with 24 Facebook messages and 231 more on The Post's message system. I missed 37 text messages, including one from my wife asking why I wasn't online, and thousands of tweets, which I'd normally scan so that I'd know, in semi-real time, what's going on in every corner of the world that interests me -- and even in some that don't, like Cleveland.

I decided I hadn't missed much of anything, aside from an invitation to a poker tournament, a funny observation about a particular country singer's forehead and this "correction," which I received from three different friends:

"In our Saturday post about the California Democratic Party's ad . . . we described the abrupt ending to our conversation with CDP Chairman John Burton. Through his spokesman, Burton on Monday complained that he had been misquoted. Burton says he didn't say '[Expletive] you.' His actual words were, 'Go [expletive] yourself.' Calbuzz regrets the error."

As they say online, where I've been forwarding that item to friends and colleagues all day:

L.O.L.

Internet, I take it all back. I can't quit you.

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2010 The Washington Post Company