washingtonpost.com
Al and Tipper Gore's sad love story: Where do we begin . . . to express our sadness?

By Ellen McCarthy
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, June 3, 2010; C01

Please, Al and Tipper, don't do this. For our sakes -- don't.

Yes, famous couples divorce all the time. But we thought the Gores were different. We believed in them. Even if we didn't agree with their politics, we admired their marriage -- the way, after all these years, they still genuinely seemed into each other.

(Photos of Tipper and Al Gore through the years)

They're like the couple down the block with the lush garden and the annual Labor Day cookout. The pair who are always power-walking together and drinking wine on the front porch, who make you nudge your husband and say, "See? I want that."

Sure they had their ups and downs -- her depression, their son's life-threatening accident -- but after four kids and 40 years, they were still in it. And still, we thought, held on to some enduring kernel of love.

Forty years.

Hasn't the finish line been crossed by the time you reach 40 years together?

Seems like this ought to be the time for an Alaskan cruise victory lap, not a move to separate residences.

And, statistically, that should be the case. No more than 1 percent of all divorces occur after 40 years of marriage. Half of them take place within the first seven years of marriage.

So this doesn't just make us sad. It makes us scared.

It means that maybe marriage isn't something we can conquer. That you can have all the necessary ingredients -- romance, good morals, mutual respect and a healthy family -- and still see this precious thing, built over decades, crumble in the end.

It makes us frightened for our parents, our friends, ourselves. "They were seen as this perfect couple, that's why we're traumatized," says Terri Orbuch, a marriage therapist and sociology professor at the University of Michigan.

"Perfect" might be an overstatement, but certainly they struck us as a great pair -- his dorky peculiarities cut by her lively, blond spunk. The truth is, we liked them more as a couple than we did individually. And we never doubted they were real. Forget the Great Convention Kiss of 2000 -- that was politicking and theatrics. Look at the way he cradles her hand in their wedding photo, how she beams at him across the lawn of the Naval Observatory. You don't fake that.

Which means something worse: that affection evaporated, rather than solidified, across their 40 years.

It's hard to conceive of the equation that could make them conclude that life on the other end of a split will be better than it was before. After sticking around that long, what could persuade a couple to forfeit all they had together? The end of incessant arguing? The prospect of another romance?

But who else will recall how adorably frustrated you got putting that model train set together on Christmas Eve? Or laugh about the time we drove out West and got miserably lost but it turned out all right because we stumbled upon that old-fashioned diner and had the best milkshakes of our lives?

A new partner won't remember. Neither will the empty spot on the other side of the bed.

We wanted to see the Gores -- our parents, our friends, the neighbors with the porch -- delight in their twilight years. Playing with their grandchildren, traveling together in a way they never could before, operating more slowly, but in union. We wanted to see them move into sweetness.

"This is supposed to be one of the easiest and happiest periods of marriage . . . the reward for a job well done," says Andrew Cherlin, a Johns Hopkins University sociology professor who studies families.

But the other fact is that we've never before faced empty-nest periods that could easily extend for 20 or 30 years. "The institution of marriage wasn't designed for that. It was designed to help us raise kids and put food on the table," says Cherlin. "It may just be that it's a difficult task for married couples to keep a happy life going for decades."

The Gores knew as much. In their 2003 book, "Joined at the Heart," -- see how seriously they took this endeavor? They wrote a book about it! -- the Gores explored the way a prolonged life expectancy could affect American unions. "If couples are in unhappy marriages they are more likely to eventually divorce as they face so much of their lifetimes together after their child-rearing years are over," they wrote.

Washington divorce lawyer Sanford K. Ain sees it occasionally, a couple breaking up after more than half a lifetime together. It reminds him of that old joke where an elderly couple is asked why they waited so long to divorce. "We wanted to wait until the kids were dead," they answer.

"More often that not, when people get divorced after that length of time, it's because they're just not content -- they're not happy," Ain says. "And they want to look for something else."

As news of the Gores' separation emerged, we jumped to speculate that that "something else" was really someone else, already waiting in the wings.

The truth is, we almost hope there's an affair involved. That makes it easier and understandable -- unequivocally someone's fault. Then it can be detestable, not just sad.

"It's more threatening to us if we see a couple who we thought were happy just drift apart," Cherlin says. "If even well-behaved people get divorced after 40 years, then some of us will worry about what our own marriages will be like later in life."

But even if there was an infidelity, Ain says that is rarely the cause of a separation after this long. "Quite frankly, even if it's a factor, it's inconceivable to me that it could be the reason for the breakup," he says. "Even if one of them has become involved with someone else, it's hard to believe they could have a bond with that other person that transcends the relationship that they have with one another."

To really work, long-term relationships need "regular attention, regular affirmation on a daily basis," says Orbuch, who recently completed a 20-year study of marriage for the National Institutes of Health. She wonders whether Al Gore was gone too much -- out saving the world -- to save his marriage. (Then again, maybe it was Tipper who was inattentive?)

Whatever the case, they did not make the decision to separate cavalierly. But the old adage that you never know what's really going on in someone else's relationship is no comfort here. We need to know -- so that we can point to whatever it was and say, "See, that won't happen to us."

It won't, will it?

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2010 The Washington Post Company