D.C. police focus on preemption to reduce murder rate, retaliatory violence

By Paul Duggan
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, June 4, 2010; A11

D.C. Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier arrived at 4022 South Capitol St. SE minutes after the gunfire March 30, as the nine victims were being loaded into ambulances. And not much time passed before she and other officials realized the motive for the drive-by attack.

Facing TV news cameras in the early evening darkness, Lanier appeared shaken, saying: "We've made a lot of progress to stop retaliation and gang violence. And, in the end, if this comes out to be some sort of gang retaliation, shame on all of us."

She already knew it was.

"I was very angry," Lanier recalled in an interview. The March 30 attack, which killed three people, ages 16 to 19, was the climax to a cycle of tit-for-tat shootings -- the sort of violence that police have been able to short-circuit in recent years, reducing the city's homicide totals.

Still, despite the lower murder rate, shootings in retaliation for violence account for a huge percentage of the District's annual homicide toll, Lanier said. The department has adopted strategies in recent years to counter the problem, she said, and the effort's success is evident in crime statistics.

It begins with an emphasis on officers building trusting relationships in the community, creating sources of information, Lanier said. "And when someone gives us information, we can't sit on it or think it over. We have to act on it immediately, so they'll see action out of us."

To promote a rapid flow of information and quick responses and prevent tips from falling through the cracks, she said, officials have created faster lines of communication among the department's myriad units and officers in different parts of the city.

"It's been a department-wide effort, every member, and it's taken three years of constant focus," Lanier said. "And it's allowed us to jump on a lot of things before they happen. . . . It's preemption -- knowing who is going after who. We'll get information that someone's traveling in a stolen car with a gun, on their way to do a shooting, and we'll be able to stop that person."

Chuck Wexler, director of the Police Executive Research Forum, said that retaliation killings account for the bulk of homicides in most big U.S. cities and that police officials nationwide have made preemption a priority, as Lanier has.

"With some kinds of shootings and murders, there's very little you can do," said Wexler, who has worked with law enforcement agencies across the country, helping them devise policing strategies. "A kid shoves another kid and the other kid shoots him -- you can't really prevent that. But if police departments don't intervene, then you'll have a second killing and a third."

In recent years, he said, "police departments everywhere have become much more strategic about developing and using information and responding not only to the immediate shooting, but to the threat of the next one and the next one. . . . In terms of retaliation, it's all about preemption. That's where police departments can really make a difference."

Lanier said the impact of the approach was evident in last year's D.C. homicide total of 143 -- a 23 percent drop from the year before and the city's lowest annual toll since 1966.

Of the 143 victims, Lanier said, 25 to 30 died from domestic violence.

Fewer than a half-dozen cases involved killings in which the victims were not targeted, the chief said, citing, for example, a 48-year-old woman killed in gang crossfire; a boy, 9, struck by a bullet fired through his family's apartment door; a 51-year-old woman shot in a liquor store holdup; and a girl, 17, slain in the crossfire between a gunman and a security guard.

As for the other homicides, "everything was retaliation," Lanier said. And she attributed the bulk of the homicide decline last year to a reduction in retribution killings.

In the days preceding the March 30 drive-by attack, Lanier said, she kept tabs on the police investigation of 20-year-old Orlando Carter.

Police suspected that Carter had taken part in a March 22 homicide. And after he was wounded in the head and right shoulder a day later by an unidentified gunman, police suspected that the motive was retaliation and that Carter was likely to strike back. Lanier said she feared the same.

After Carter was treated for his wounds March 23, "we knew when he walked out of that hospital that he was intent on getting his own justice," the chief said.

On March 30, as Lanier stood at 4022 South Capitol St., Carter, who allegedly had planned the drive-by attack in retaliation for his shooting, was a few blocks away, having been arrested after a chase.

Suddenly, the chief heard the arresting officer say by radio: "The suspect is an adult male, 20 years old, complaining of a wound on his face and one of his arms. Says he was shot."

And right then, Lanier said, it dawned on her what had happened: She realized the motive for the attack and knew that police had failed to head off the kind of violence that she considers a priority.

"I heard that radio transmission and I knew immediately," Lanier said. "The guy's 20, he'd been shot. That's when I looked around and said, 'It's [expletive] Orlando Carter!' "

© 2010 The Washington Post Company