Fed Page   |   E-Mail Newsletter  Fed Insider E-Mail   |    RSS   |   Column Archive

TSA nominee is urged to reject airport screeners' push for collective bargaining

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Joe Davidson
Friday, June 11, 2010

In the past six months, a man with a bomb in his underpants was accused of trying to blow up a plane bound for Detroit, a suspect was pulled off a plane after apparently trying to set off a car bomb in Times Square, and two men apparently on their way to train with an al-Qaeda-allied group in Somalia were arrested at a New York airport.

Yet with all the security-related issues on the Transportation Security Administration's agenda, the main thing on the minds of few senators at a confirmation hearing for the agency's proposed administrator is the perceived danger that could befall the United States if airport screeners are allowed to bargain collectively.

During a confirmation hearing Thursday, two Republican senators pressed John S. Pistole, President Obama's latest nominee to run the TSA, to reject the efforts at collective bargaining.

Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (Tex.), the top Republican on the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, urged Pistole, deputy director of the FBI, to resist pressure from federal employee unions to secure bargaining rights for nearly 50,000 transportation security officers.

"I am adamantly against that," she said.

Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) said that collective bargaining would "significantly undermine TSA's ability to respond to threats and protect the nation." Allowing airport screeners to bargain would have a "direct negative impact" on airport security, he said, because it would hamper the agency's "ability to deploy people at any time."

DeMint said the FBI does not have collective bargaining. He did not mention that employees who do have collective bargaining include customs inspectors, border patrol agents, the Capitol Police, uniformed Secret Service officers and the Park Police in the federal service, according to the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association. Many state and local police officers and firefighters also have such rights.

Pistole was noncommittal about the issue. He said that Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano had asked him to review the question if he is confirmed.

DeMint did score a point when Pistole said that collective bargaining at the FBI would not improve national security. "From the FBI's perspective, we have to have the ability to surge resources at any time," he said.

No one demonstrated that collective bargaining would hamper the TSA's ability to deploy screeners.

"They created a big bad wolf they are afraid of," Jon Adler, president of the law enforcement officers association, said of the collective-bargaining opponents. "There is no big bad wolf."

For John Gage, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, "facts do matter. It is untrue that any collective bargaining agreement would impede national security," he said in a statement. "It is untrue that TSA personnel would have to first check with their union reps before acting in an emergency situation."


CONTINUED     1        >

© 2010 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity