» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments

Newly released Kagan papers show a flair for the political

In 63 to 37 vote, the Senate confirmed U.S. Solicitor General Elena Kagan as the 112th justice to the Supreme Court, making her the fourth woman ever to sit on the high court.

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Alec MacGillis
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, June 12, 2010

Elena Kagan arrived in the White House counsel's office in 1995 as a professor on leave with scant political experience. But according to documents released Friday, she quickly found herself immersed in the scandals and dust-ups of Bill Clinton's presidency: the Paula Jones case, Whitewater and a controversy over mishandled FBI files.

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

The 42,000 pages from the Clinton library -- the second of three batches to be released before the Supreme Court confirmation hearings that are to begin June 28 -- give the strongest evidence yet that Kagan would bring to the court far more experience than most recent justices in the political circus that often defines Washington. Previously released files from her tenure as a domestic policy adviser, from 1997 to 1999, reflected her involvement in issues such as abortion, gun control and welfare. The new documents show that even in her more junior role as a deputy White House counsel between 1995 and 1997, Kagan was taking part in dramas and debates that often were as political in nature as legal -- and that she was showing a relish for them.

Dozens of memos to and from Kagan reveal that she was enmeshed in strategizing to defend the president in the sexual harassment lawsuit filed by Jones, a former Arkansas state employee -- a White House effort that extended beyond normal administration duties.

Kagan routinely kept her boss, White House counsel Jack Quinn, and Clinton's private attorneys abreast on developments in the case, and the other lawyers sought out her thoughts.

Her advice often veered into politics. In one memo, she noted that a University of Chicago law professor helping on the case had suggested an amicus brief by members of Congress in support of Clinton. She discouraged the idea, warning that "if only Democrats joined, the brief would increase the partisan feel of the case" and that "getting such a brief might be difficult -- and our efforts to do so might become public."

On Whitewater, the long-running investigation into an Arkansas land deal involving the Clintons, Kagan took the lead in late 1995 in trying to round up legal experts willing to endorse the White House argument that attorney-client confidentiality rules protected Clinton's lawyers from divulging information.

"We need people who will support the general proposition -- through op-eds or other contacts with the press -- that conversations between a President's White House counsel and his private counsel can, in at least some circumstances, be privileged," she wrote her boss at the time, White House counsel Abner J. Mikva.

Notes show that she called a list of potential supporters, most of whom said they would be glad to sign an op-ed article if the White House drafted it. Soon the deed was done: Robert Lipshutz, White House counsel under President Jimmy Carter, wrote an op-ed piece with Kagan's help and shopped it to The Washington Post and the New York Times.

In June 1996, Kagan was drawn into the controversy over the White House's request of hundreds of security-clearance documents from the FBI, including those of officials from some Republican administration. She attended a meeting on proposed Republican measures to restrict use of FBI files and summarized it in a tartly written memo.

She wrote that the White House could "try to work with the Republicans before the committee vote, showing them that their amendments are absurd and persuading them to go for ours instead." Or, she said, it could "let the Republicans do what they want, attempt to embarrass them in public by highlighting the lunacy of their proposals, and taking our amendment out of the bag at the last minute as an alternative."

The William J. Clinton Presidential Library withheld about 1,800 pages from Friday's set of documents, asserting the need to protect personal privacy and confidential advice to the president. About three-quarters of those pages are available to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The panel's top Republican, Sen. Jeff Sessions (Ala.), said the document release was inadequate, noting that the final batch, which will include Kagan's e-mails, is to arrive just before the hearings. Chairman Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) responded that the library had released more documents than had been produced for the most recent GOP court nominees, John G. Roberts Jr. and Samuel A. Alito Jr.


CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments

More on the Supreme Court

[The Supreme Court]

The Supreme Court

Full coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court, including key cases and nominations to the nation's highest court.

[Guantanamo Prison]

Guantanamo Prison

Full coverage of the U.S. prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, including Supreme Court rulings over its legality.

© 2010 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity