washingtonpost.com
Battle looms over new job heading financial watchdog

By Brady Dennis
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, July 20, 2010; A17

President Obama has yet to sign the bill that will overhaul financial regulations, and already a tug of war is unfolding over whom he will tap for the highest-profile position created by the landmark legislation.

At the center of this wrangling is Elizabeth Warren, an outspoken Harvard law professor who served as a key architect of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the new regulator that she is a top candidate to lead.

Warren, who chairs the congressional panel overseeing the federal bailout of the nation's banks, isn't the only candidate for the powerful post. Others include Michael S. Barr, an assistant Treasury secretary, and Eugene Kimmelman, a deputy assistant attorney general in the Justice Department's Antitrust Division. But she is easily the best-known and the most polarizing.

In recent days, consumer advocates and activist groups have pressed Obama to appoint Warren, arguing that she has a long track record as a champion for middle-class families.

Critics say that she lacks the experience for the job, that she has antagonized members of Congress and Treasury officials alike with her inquiries into the federal bank bailout program and that her crusading on behalf of consumers could harm the banking industry and restrict credit to ordinary Americans.

Warren, a ubiquitous presence on television and on Capitol Hill the past year, has remained mostly silent about the post.

Watchdog with autonomy

The bill approved by Congress last week will establish an independent consumer bureau within the Federal Reserve aimed at protecting borrowers from abuses in mortgages, credit cards and other such loans. The new watchdog, an essential feature of proposals to expand financial regulation since the Obama administration released its blueprint last year, will have autonomy to write and enforce its own rules, a dedicated source of funding and a presidentially appointed, independent director.

That director will have broad authority to shape the new bureau and to set the tone for how aggressively it pursues its mission of protecting consumers, a task that regulators often neglected in the run-up to the financial crisis. The director would also have a seat on the board of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and would serve as a member of the Financial Services Oversight Council, a council charged with monitoring potential threats to the financial system.

After media reports last week that Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner opposed giving the job to Warren -- which his advisers have disputed, saying Geither thinks she is "well qualified" -- liberal groups, commentators and lawmakers sprang into action.

An online petition to appoint Warren drew tens of thousands of signatures, according to the Progressive Change Campaign Committee. Americans for Financial Reform, a coalition of nearly 200 consumer, labor and civil rights organizations, weighed in on her behalf. She "has shown a steadfast and tireless commitment to protecting consumers throughout her distinguished career and is without question the best candidate to run the new CFPB," the group's leader, Heather Booth, said in a statement.

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) circulated a letter praising Warren as a potential head of the consumer agency.

Republicans and the financial industry largely opposed the new consumer bureau from the start and are unlikely to warm to any candidate.

'Is she confirmable?'

"I'm not sure anybody is particularly easy to confirm. . . . Whoever they pick will be in for a big fight," said one administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the appointment is pending. "Because she's so highly visible and because she's been in the media, people are a little more polarized around her than the other folks."

Senate banking committeeChairman Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.) foreshadowed such a fight Monday in an interview on WAMU-FM's "Diane Rehm Show."

"Elizabeth, I think, would be a great nominee," he said. "The question is: Is she confirmable? And there's a serious question about it."

Even if every Democrat voted in her favor, Warren would need Republican support to reach the 60 votes required to break a Senate filibuster. That's assuming every Democrat would back Warren; some observers on Capitol Hill and in the administration question that, given her forceful personality and her history of questioning some of the administration's decisions in her role as bailout watchdog.

Warren is "not the only potential nominee. There are many fine nominees," Dodd said Monday. "I don't think it's limited to one person, either. I get a little concerned when people think there's only one individual who can do this job. That's not true."

The decision boils down in part to a political calculation for Obama. What message does the White House want to send with such an appointment? Whom does he feel comfortable with to shape the bureau for the long term? Does the administration really want a confirmation fight? Could a battle with Republicans over someone such as Warren prove politically advantageous?

Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), another banking committee member who spent many hours negotiating with Democrats over the financial legislation, declined Monday to speak about specific candidates but said he hopes the president chooses someone who will act judiciously.

"I hope for the good of our country that what the president will do is nominate someone who's a thoughtful, balanced person, because of the amount of power this person is going to have," said Corker, noting the large budget, autonomy and five-year term granted to the new director.

He added: "If the president nominates an activist, a zealot, it will confirm the greatest fears that many of us had having an agency of this type, because of the incredible power they are going to have over the financial system."

The White House has been careful to leave its options open, even as officials have expressed faith both in Warren's qualifications and her ability to win Senate approval.

"While there are a number of strong choices under consideration for this position, Elizabeth Warren is a champion for consumers and middle-class families, and we are confident she is confirmable," White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki said.

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2010 The Washington Post Company