washingtonpost.com
Setting limits

Tuesday, July 27, 2010; A11

Some suggested measures to control systemic risk by limiting credit and asset bubbles:

Force homeowners and investors to make larger down payments on property.

Pro: Protects banks by ensuring that mortgage holders have more equity, and cools property markets by slowing demand.

Con: Prevents some creditworthy buyers from obtaining loans if they cannot save enough for the down payment.

Force banks to set aside more capital during good times.

Pro: Keeps institutions from lending too freely when property markets are overheating, and builds up capital reserves to help banks through downturns.

Con: Like any "counterycyclical" policy, risks limiting otherwise healthy economic growth.

Raise interest rates.

Pro: Slows lending and borrowing by increasing the cost.

Con: Traditionally, central banks have used interest-rate policy to regulate the overall economy. Using it to focus on problems in specific sectors, such as real estate, might undercut those other aims.

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2010 The Washington Post Company