Oil spill highlights conflict-of-interest issue within investigation agency
Saturday, July 31, 2010
David Dykes -- the federal regulator now leading his agency's investigation of the BP oil spill -- has spent five years as a senior investigator and office chief enforcing oil industry safety in the Gulf of Mexico. For much of that time, his brother was a top executive at an energy company with significant activities under Dykes's purview.
But David Dykes did not formally recuse himself from matters involving his brother's company. No rule required him to do so. Unlike many federal agencies that make employees distance themselves from matters involving friends, relatives or former bosses, the nation's chief oil regulatory agency had no such policy.
Now, in the wake of the BP disaster, Congress is pressing the agency formerly called the U.S. Minerals Management Service to clamp down on potential conflicts of interest. The case of David and Rodney Dykes highlights the challenges of the task. The oil industry of the Gulf Coast is an insular world in which rig foremen and the federal inspectors charged with regulating them sometimes work side by side, or grew up in the same towns and even homes.
Investigations into the BP spill have focused on whether MMS regulators properly oversaw the Deepwater Horizon rig or merely accepted company assurances that the rig was safe. An inspector general investigation in May showed that MMS regulators in the gulf sometimes viewed themselves more as industry friends and fishing buddies than policemen. In one office, they took free trips, sporting tickets and gifts from industry officials they were supposed to be monitoring, the investigation found.
Since June, the newly renamed Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement [BOEM] has worked to develop new rules that would require inspectors to recuse themselves from matters in which they have a family or other personal conflict. Michael Bromwich, the new head of BOEM, said the agency needs a strong recusal policy to assuage public concerns about closeness between regulators and industry.
"Since arriving a month ago to lead reforms at BOEM, it is clear to me that there are concerns about conflicts of interest that we must address within the agency's inspections and investigation programs. We're looking very closely at these issues, including implementing new recusal policies and taking appropriate action where necessary," Bromwich said.
Bromwich said he and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar have confidence in David Dykes's work as co-chair of a team investigating the BP spill.
Both David Dykes and his brother declined to comment. A spokesperson at the former MMS said David Dykes was never asked to review any matters involving Energy Partners, where Rodney Dykes was a senior vice president for production, or Stone Energy, a company under a tentative merger with the firm in 2006.
David Dykes, a native of Hammond, La., has worked in the gulf oil business for nearly three decades, as had Rodney Dykes. David Dykes drew the attention of MMS officials when, as a safety manager at Taylor Oil, he helped shape a model safety plan. In 1999, he joined MMS, and by 2005, he was a senior safety inspector in the Office of Safety Management. He became office chief in February 2007. David Dykes was considered a "junkyard dog" as an investigator, a former MMS manager said. His office oversaw accident investigations, issued industry safety alerts, imposed civil penalties and recommended regulation changes.
Rodney Dykes stayed on the corporate side, including a short stint with his brother at Maxus Energy. By 2001, he had joined Energy Partners Ltd., and he rose to senior vice president in 2003.
From 2006 to early 2008, Energy Partners and a company under a tentative merger agreement with it in 2006 reported 30 incidents including fires, explosions, collisions and injuries on their rigs and facilities, according to MMS records. The MMS judged 25 to be very minor or not meeting the criteria for an investigation, and did not probe further. District offices far below Dykes's investigated the other five.
In three cases where MMS inspectors found company violations and failures, MMS fined the companies an average of $18,000 for each incident.