Fed Page   |  Column Archive  |    RSS   |   Daily Politics Q&A

At 50, Cuban trade embargo is not aging well

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Al Kamen
Friday, August 6, 2010

The half-century-old Cuban trade embargo has seen better days. For its first 30 years, when the Castro crowd was in cahoots with the Soviets -- even welcomed nukes 90 miles from Florida -- the embargo enjoyed widespread support.

The collapse of the Soviet Union 20 years ago undermined the Cold War rationale for the effort. International and domestic support steadily eroded. Even Bay of Pigs veteran Francisco J. Hernandez, head of the hard-line Cuban American National Foundation, last year undercut the once-sacred embargo, not calling for ending it but calling it "a symbol'' and "not something that is that important anymore."

But you're in very deep trouble when none other than Soldier of Fortune magazine blasts the embargo in an article headlined "Fifty Years of Failure: Petrified U.S. Policy Toward Cuba."

Worse, the lead author of the piece, coming out in the October issue, is Jay Mallin, a former Latin America reporter for the Washington Times and news director of Radio Marti during the Reagan administration. (His co-author is former Miami Herald Latin America editor Don Bohning, who covered Cuba and the region for many years.)

The embargo "is essentially an absurdity that accomplishes nothing," they write, and "has been a boon to the Castro government, providing a handy excuse" for its failures. They recount arguments, usually spouted by the libs, for changing course.

On the international front, the United Nations has regularly condemned the embargo. Last year's cliff-hanger vote was 187 to 3 -- the United States, Israel and Palau (although key allies Micronesia and the Marshall Islands abstained). The Organization of American States, which kicked Cuba out in 1962, invited the Cubans back in, they note. Cuba declined.

The authors include a list of lesser-publicized matters. For example, "U.S. appliances and such are sold to Cuba by other trading nations, such as Panama."

And it's not as if the two governments aren't cooperating on a number of matters, Mallin and Bohning write, including immigration and the Navy base at Guantanamo. After the BP oil disaster, "U.S. and Cuban officials conferred on the potential oil threat to Cuba." In addition, "U.S. and Cuban coast guards coordinate on anti-drug operations" and "military personnel recently held joint maneuvers in an anti-drug exercise. Helicopters from the two sides flew over each other's jurisdictions."

The Castro regime is already crumbling, the authors say, so "logic indicates that the U.S. should be dealing openly with Cuba, moving into a position which might enable it to influence events, helping it get back on the road to democracy." Not to mention keeping the island from becoming an 800-mile landing strip for the drug cartels.

In recent years, agriculture and business groups have been increasingly opposed. A business group from Virginia went there recently. (And look for Obama administration action, after Congress leaves town, to loosen travel restrictions.)

Still, we have always counseled patience. It is virtually guaranteed that the embargo, if given another 10 years, will see the Castro brothers -- Fidel is 84, Raul is 79 -- gone from power.

It's official

The Senate, heading out of town Thursday, confirmed Marine Gen. James Mattis as head of U.S. Central Command, replacing Gen. David H. Petraeus, who's now the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan. Centcom oversees the Middle East as well as Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran.

As expected, the Senate approved retired Air Force Lt. Gen. James R. Clapper's nomination to be director of national intelligence, replacing Dennis Blair. The approval came after Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) withdrew objections to the nomination.

In addition, J. Michelle Childs and Richard Mark Gergel, both of South Carolina, and Leonard Stark of Delaware were approved as trial judges. James Wynn was approved for a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit.

Forget us not

Richard M. Nixon, after his 1962 defeat in the California gubernatorial race, famously told the press that "you won't have Nixon to kick around any more."

Ah, so wonderfully, gloriously wrong. Even now, 48 years later, we're still kicking him around. As our colleague Craig Whitlock reported on Thursday, the president lied about who authorized the 1971-72 airstrikes over North Vietnam -- although White House tapes showed he felt bad, really bad, about making Air Force Gen. John D. Lavelle take the fall for the bombings.

Of course, Nixon didn't feel bad enough to admit that he authorized the strikes, or even to refrain from lying publicly about it and saying Lavelle had to go.

This weekend marks the 36th anniversary of Nixon's resignation from office: speech to the nation Aug. 8, 1974, famous helicopter departure from the White House on Aug. 9. Why, it seems like only . . . actually, a long time ago. Obama was but a teenager in Kenya, just beginning to work out the campaign strategy.


© 2010 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile