Two of Obama's closest advisers among those likely to leave in White House shuffle

President Barack Obama got heckled at a fundraiser Wednesday night by protesters pushing for more funding for AIDS programs and quicker action to allow gays to serve openly in the military.
By Anne E. Kornblut and Scott Wilson
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, September 23, 2010; 2:36 AM

In his nearly two years in office, President Obama has relied on a very small clique of advisers that serves as his most trusted sounding board on politics and policy.

Members of his staff describe Obama as wary of outsiders and reluctant to widen his inner circle. As one of his advisers bluntly put it, the president "doesn't like new people."

Like it or not, he will soon be surrounded by them as an expected staff shuffle will deprive Obama of two of his closest aides and an influx of replacements will take their places within the West Wing.

The inner circle - Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, senior advisers David Axelrod and Valerie Jarrett, press secretary Robert Gibbs and Vice President Biden - is breaking up, or at least breaking open. Emanuel is widely expected to run for mayor of Chicago, and Axelrod is likely to leave this spring to prepare for Obama's 2012 reelection effort.

Obama will soon lose other top advisers. His chief economic adviser, Lawrence H. Summers, announced that he will return to Harvard, where he is a professor; Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina is expected to join Axelrod in Chicago; and national security adviser James L. Jones is said to want out by the end of the year.

Some former aides and allies of the president expressed hope that Obama will take advantage of the departures - which are common at the two-year point in any presidency - to bring in outsiders who will challenge the president's current team.

"They miscalculated where people were out in the country on jobs, on spending, on the deficit, on debt," said a longtime Democratic strategist who works with the White House on a variety of issues. "They have not been able to get ahead of any of it. And it's all about the insularity. Otherwise how do you explain how a group who came in with more goodwill in decades squandered it?" The strategist asked not to be identified in order to speak freely about the president and his staff.

This is not an uncommon view among Democratic political professionals, many of whom share the goals of the White House but have grown frustrated with a staff they see as unapproachable and set in their ways.

But Obama might not look too far beyond the walls of the White House in his search for new advisers. In the pervasive but often unreliable Washington guessing game, the names most often heard are already familiar to the president: Tom Donilon, Obama's deputy national security adviser, is thought to be a leading contender either for Emanuel's job or for Jones's post. Donilon and Obama became close during the 2008 campaign, when he was in charge of prepping the candidate for debates.

Senior adviser Pete Rouse is another possible choice to replace Emanuel. He served as Obama's chief of staff in the Senate. Other possible candidates include Bob Bauer, the White House counsel, who was the president's personal attorney before he joined the administration last year; Phil Schiliro, who runs Obama's congressional liaison office; and former Senate majority leader Tom Daschle, a close Obama ally.

Recent White House hires reflect the president's desire to surround himself with people he knows well. Elizabeth Warren, recently tapped as the government's first consumer protection adviser, is someone Obama describes as a "dear friend." Austan Goolsbee, brought in as the new chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, has been in the Obama orbit much longer than the woman he replaced, Christina Romer.

White House officials resist the notion that they are an out-of-touch palace guard. They say Obama is presented with a wide range of views from people inside and outside of the administration. And, they point out, the inner circle does not always get its way. Emanuel and Biden, for example, were on the losing side of debates over how to approach health-care reform (Emanuel argued against taking it up so early in Obama's first term) and the war in Afghanistan (both were against the troop surge).

CONTINUED     1        >

© 2010 The Washington Post Company