Election 2010: Spending on midterm campaigns could affect 2012 race
Use this interactive to track campaign spending by interest groups and political parties in the 2010 midterm elections.
Tuesday, November 2, 2010; 11:09 PM
If you think the 2010 elections were expensive, just wait until 2012.
The midterms have shattered spending records for a nonpresidential contest, providing a likely blueprint for the frenzy to come when the White House is up for grabs in two years, according to political consultants, campaign-finance experts and activists from both parties.
The numbers have been driven upward in part by a proliferation of outside interest groups - particularly on the Republican side - that have taken advantage of favorable court rulings to raise and spend money more freely than in the past.
Independent groups have reported spending $270 million so far, but that number does not include tens of millions of dollars more that were not disclosed to the Federal Election Commission. Much of the money has been spent by nonprofit groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce that do not have to reveal the sources of funds.
"It's the how-to for 2012," said Ellen Miller, executive director of the Sunlight Foundation, which tracks money in politics. "It's how to use corporate money, how to use secret money, to buy elections. . . . It's going to be no-holds-barred."
The rise of unfettered anonymous spending poses a policy and political dilemma for President Obama, who has criticized the Supreme Court's decision that corporations can spend unlimited funds on elections and has repeatedly attacked the role of conservative interest groups in the midterms.
Aides and strategists close to Obama are debating how to cope with the issue looking ahead to 2012, according to sources familiar with the talks. White House officials declined to comment.
Obama discouraged independent groups from campaigning on his behalf in 2008, relying on a massive ground-level political operation to raise a record amount of money for a presidential campaign, much of it from small donors.
But he now faces a changed landscape in which major businesses and interest groups can raise unlimited funds, largely in secret, in support of a Republican challenger. Although Obama can call on unions and other traditional Democratic groups, their track record this year suggests they may have a difficult time keeping up.
"My party has some collective soul-searching to do," said Jim Jordan, a Democratic strategist who co-founded Commonsense Ten, a "super PAC" that spent about $3 million in support of Democrats this year. "Obviously, we find this kind of politics distasteful. But we'll have to ask ourselves whether our causes and constituencies are best served by disarming or by getting in the game in a more robust way."
One big new player on the scene this year is American Crossroads and its nonprofit sister group, Crossroads GPS, which was founded with support from GOP strategists Karl Rove and Ed Gillespie. The two groups have together reported spending about $40 million on ads and other election-related activities through Sunday and say they plan to continue through the 2012 election.
Another leading outside group, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, has reported spending $32 million, almost entirely in support of Republicans, FEC data show; the group had said it planned to spend well over $50 million during the 2010 cycle. The top independent Democratic group was the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, which has reported spending about $12 million to the FEC.