washingtonpost.com
Thousands of Democrats to be jobless in Washington

By Al Kamen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 4, 2010; 5:55 PM

The Great Shellacking of 2010 will throw more than 2,000 Democratic congressional staffers out of their jobs. And it will send thousands of gleeful Republican staffer wannabes into overdrive to get those resumes up to the Hill to fill those vacancies.

Here's a back-of-the-envelope look at the numbers: On the House side, 60 victorious GOP candidates are expected to hire more than 1,000 new aides in their personal offices. The staff allocations on the House committees have yet to be worked out, but they often run 2 to 1 for the majority party, so that could add up to a shift of maybe 800 or so jobs. Then there are the new House leadership staffs and so on.

On the Senate side, the six new GOP senators are likely to hire around 150 personal office aides, and more Republican committee staff members will be sitting behind the senators at hearings.

Democrats, with a sagging local economy - K Street isn't hiring the way it used to, foundations and think tanks are pressed, colleges are hurting, corporations are frozen - may well be pounding the pavement for quite a while.

The situation, one senior House Democratic aide said, "is very bleak, especially for mid-level people." A senior House Republican aide commiserated. "I was here in 2006," he said, when the Democrats captured the House as well as the Senate. "It was very tough." And that was before the economy tanked.

There will be jobs for senior aides, said Tony Podesta, head of Podesta Associates. "The market will be tough," he said, but people with great experience and stellar reputations "will always find a place."

Washington has long been "immune from employment trends," he said, but it's going to get a taste of what the rest of the country has been experiencing.

Former Clinton press secretary Joe Lockhart, who runs the Glover Park Group, was a bit more optimistic. In 1994, when the Democrats lost the House for the first time in 50 years - and the Senate as well - the lobbying and political strategy business was a lot smaller and foundations hardly had a presence. "The industry is much bigger than it was in 1994," he said, and the "corporate footprint in town is bigger." So each potential employer may not be filling many slots, he said, "but there are a lot more of them."

On the other hand, job-hunting Democrats also are facing competition from GOP aides, Lockhart said. "If you're a top House Republican staffer thinking of making a move" to the private sector and the big bucks, "now's a good time."

And there's more bad news. After the "Drubbing of '94," some 220 panicky Senate and House Democratic aides jumped to Clinton administration lifeboats and got jobs in federal agencies. They did so under the 1940 Ramspeck Act, which allowed them to circumvent civil service rules and snag jobs.

Then-White House Chief of Staff Leon Panetta, we wrote just after that election, "announced at a White House staff meeting that administration personnel boss Veronica Biggins is putting a group together to work with the congressionally unemployed to see what can be done for them."

But the Ramspeck Act was repealed in 1997. And there aren't many mid-level political jobs unfilled at the agencies. So the administration can't do much this time around.

Just what we needed. More bloggers.

The other do-not-fly list

"People are still catching their breath" from the election, President Obama said Thursday morning as he announced that he would soon meet with Republican leaders to work on overcoming gridlock.

"The American people don't want us just standing still," he said. Taking his own advice, he's off Friday for a 10-day swing to Asia. Should be able to catch his breath there.

And maybe some shellshocked House and Senate Democrats are thinking about taking their spouses on a spectacular taxpayer-funded fact-finding trip abroad before heading out of town. Ah, the military jets, the miraculously appearing and disappearing luggage, the escort past immigration, the embassy-provided chauffeurs.

One problem: House Rule XXIV and Senate Rule XXXIX explicitly bar such foreign travel by lame ducks - and their personal and committee staffers.

We are certain our lawmakers will abide by the rules. If you know any who are not, that address is kamena@washpost.com. Operators are standing by.

Wrong numbers

Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, blasted by conservatives for publicly advocating passage of a Nevada initiative that would have judges appointed by the governor rather than directly elected by the voters, also suffered a defeat Tuesday. The initiative was overwhelmingly rejected, 58 percent to 42 percent.

Her errant 1 a.m. robo-call messages to 50,000 Nevadans probably didn't help.

Bubba's world

There was much head-scratching amongst the 500 guests at the Middle East Institute's gala Wednesday night as to why former president Bill Clinton's speech was off-the-record.

It was vintage Clinton: an hour, no notes, no teleprompter, taking you on a dazzling world tour from poor African villages to the Large Hadron Collider and subatomic elements. Statistics flowed like wine.

He mentioned that he campaigned at 133 events - which, given the results, shows how rusty he is on the rubber-chicken circuit - and then added under his breath that those he worked for did pretty well.

On the Middle East, Clinton said history shows that Washington must be involved, and he highly praised the Saudi land-for-peace plan. We're told he also said that, but for Yitzhak Rabin's assassination, there would have been a peace deal between Israel and the Palestinians and with Syria. (But didn't he tell George W. Bush that you can't make a deal with Yasser Arafat?)

Clinton was introduced by a former head of the U.S. Central Command, retired Marine Gen. Anthony Zinni, who called Clinton the "finest commander in chief I ever served under."

Clinton then told those in attendance they'd just seen a demonstration of Clinton's Fourth Rule of Politics: "Make sure you are introduced by someone you appointed to high office, because then they are sure to lie shamelessly about you."

Sometimes you forget just how good this guy is.

Research editor Alice Crites contributed to this column.

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2010 The Washington Post Company