House panel to begin trial of Rangel on ethics charges
With no lawyers expected at his side, Rep. Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.) is scheduled to begin his defense Monday against allegations that he broke congressional rules in his personal finances and his fundraising efforts for a New York college.
The public trial, conducted by an eight-member panel of Rangel's congressional peers, will be the first of its kind since 2002. It will be all the more remarkable for Rangel because he no longer has a defense team.
After spending more than $2 million from his campaign account on lawyers and communications experts, Rangel and his team parted ways in September. They had repeatedly clashed over his approach to the defense, including his impromptu decision to deliver a more than 30-minute speech on the House floor in mid-August.
"I am not going away," Rangel, 80, said during that speech, imploring the ethics committee to hold the trial immediately so he could have his case heard before the midterm elections. "Don't leave me swinging in the wind until November."
Now, after winning his 21st term two weeks ago, the former assistant U.S. attorney will get his first dose of something resembling a courtroom since the mid-1960s. Expected to last about a week, Rangel's trial is to be followed two weeks later by a trial of Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.). She is accused of improperly using her office's influence in helping get federal bailout support for a bank in which her husband was a large investor.
The logistics of the cases are somewhat unclear because the ethics committee tends to operate in deep levels of secrecy. The prosecution will be represented by staff lawyers for the committee who handled the two-year investigation of Rangel; the congressman is expected to deliver an opening statement that would likely mirror much of his August floor speech.
It is unclear whether witnesses will be on hand or if committee lawyers will just read transcripts, and, if witnesses are present, whether Rangel will cross-examine them under oath.
Rangel's office declined to comment for this story. The lawmaker has acknowledged that he broke some rules, but he said that he did so unknowingly and that his mistakes involved no acts of corruption related to legislation.
The jury, effectively, is a committee of four Democrats and four Republicans, led by Reps. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), the chairman of the full panel, and Michael McCaul (R-Tex.).
Known officially as an adjudicatory subcommittee, the panel hit an impasse in late July and could not reach a deal with the 40-year veteran of Congress, who had to surrender the powerful chairmanship of the Ways and Means Committee during the investigation.
After they conclude the public phase of the trial, members of this subcommittee will huddle in private to consider the 13 counts against Rangel. If he is found guilty on any count, they will send a report to the full ethics committee to consider what level of sanction should be administered.
Members of the ethics committee quarreled publicly over the timing of the Rangel and Waters trials, with Republicans accusing Lofgren of putting off the cases until after the midterm elections in an effort to duck the issue.