washingtonpost.com
Protections for wolf, grizzly might be lifted

By Laura Zuckerman
Sunday, December 5, 2010; A03

SALMON, Idaho - The Obama administration is seeking to lift Endangered Species Act protections from two of the most iconic symbols of the American West, the gray wolf and grizzly bear, in moves likely to spark fierce resistance from environmentalists.

The administration's intentions emerged in an interview on Wednesday with two top-ranking officials from the Interior Department, whose agency, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, oversees federal safeguards for the bulk of imperiled species.

The grizzly and gray wolf occupy the figurative pinnacle of the greater Yellowstone ecosystem encompassing parts of Montana, Wyoming and Idaho. Previous efforts to remove them from the U.S. endangered species list have met with staunch opposition in court from wildlife conservation groups.

Environmentalists have raised concerns that although both species have made a comeback under protection as endangered species, their recovery could falter if they were de-listed, a move that is likely to open the animals to public hunting.

Sportsmen and ranchers, who make up a powerful constituency in Western states, have strongly advocated de-listing wolves and grizzlies, saying the predators are diminishing herds of big-game animals such as elk and are preying on livestock.

Wolves and grizzlies were hunted, trapped and poisoned to near-extinction in the lower 48 states before they were eventually added to the endangered species list.

Federal protection of wolves has been especially controversial since they were reintroduced to the wild in the Rockies in the mid-1990s despite strong objections of ranchers.

Under pressure from livestock interests and state wildlife managers, the federal government in April 2009 removed the wolf from the endangered species list in Montana and Idaho while keeping protections in Wyoming.

But a federal judgethis year ordered full listing restored, saying the wolves' entire range in the Rockies must be treated as a whole and that protections cannot be left intact in Wyoming while they are lifted in other states.

Tom Strickland, assistant interior secretary for fish, wildlife and parks, said on Wednesday that the Obama administration planned to propose lifting Endangered Species Act protection for wolves in all three states and would seek congressional action if necessary.

De-listing means states would assume management of the estimated 1,700 wolves in the Northern Rockies - about 1,000 more than the federal recovery goal for the species.

In the same interview, Fish and Wildlife Service Deputy Director Dan Ashe said his agency also "will de-list the grizzly" in the Yellowstone region.

"We're moving forward with the states," he added, predicting final action within 18 months.

The estimated number of grizzlies in the Yellowstone area has risen to more than 600 from 136 in 1975, exceeding the recovery goal of 500.

Yellowstone area grizzlies were de-listed in 2007 and states promptly planned hunting seasons. But environmentalists gained a legal victory last year, forcing the government to re-list them, saying that the federal government had failed to take into account such factors as climate change. They also questioned whether 500 animals was a viable population.

Environmentalists say getting Congress to bypass normal procedures for reviewing the health of protected species and judicial review of those efforts would undermine the Endangered Species Act, a cornerstone of American conservation law.

"Wildlife management decisions are supposed to be made based on science, not politics," said Mike Leahy, Rocky Mountain regional director of a private group, Defenders of Wildlife. "It means every time a controversial critter comes up under the Endangered Species Act, Congress could whittle away protections needed to conserve the species."

- Reuters

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2010 The Washington Post Company