Insurers, health-care providers at odds on rules for 'accountable care organizations'
Sunday, January 9, 2011; 5:50 PM
The new health law encourages doctors, hospitals and insurers to team up in treating patients, but these groups already are at odds as they urge the government to set rules protecting their financial interests.
At issue are "accountable care organizations," which the Obama administration hopes will spring up around the country, initially treating Medicare patients but eventually other people as well. Networks of doctors and hospitals would coordinate patient care and earn bonuses if they save Medicare money and meet quality targets.
The goal is to impose efficiency on a health system that now fosters disjointed and excessive medical care, driving up costs. The health law calls for ACOs to be launched in January 2012, with each capable of treating at least 5,000 Medicare patients. As envisioned, these networks of doctors and hospitals might work for the same organization or separately, sharing information about patients and financial responsibility for their care.
But the ACO concept - like others in the health-care law that rejigger the financial relationships among providers and insurers - was written broadly. Lawmakers left it to regulators to figure out how to put the provisions into practice. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services must flesh out many issues: Who can run an ACO? How are Medicare patients placed in ACOs and informed of these new arrangements? How is the caliber of care judged, and how will bonuses be awarded? What prevents these networks from becoming so large that they can dictate prices to private insurers?
"There are some tough issues with this regulation," says Jonathan Blum, a deputy administrator at CMS.
With regulators planning to issue rules for ACOs in the coming weeks, some prominent doctor and hospital groups are pushing for features that some experts say could undermine the overall goal - improving care while containing costs. They're seeking limits on how the quality of their care will be judged, along with bonus rules that would make it easier for them to be paid extra for their work and to be paid quickly.
Hospital and doctor groups also want to avoid being held financially accountable for patients who go outside an ACO for care. And the groups are resisting efforts to penalize them if they miss savings targets, according to letters they've sent to CMS.
Insurers, meanwhile, are pushing CMS to put a tighter rein on ACOs. They are fearful that ACOs will try to make up lost revenue from Medicare by charging privately insured people more or coaxing them to get more treatments. Insurers also worry that ACOs will give doctors and hospitals more power to set health-care prices in the private market.
Some people who came up with the ACO concept are also worried that CMS might give providers too much leeway.
"It's difficult to set up an ACO system where providers are able to simply pick and choose" their patients, says Mark McClellan, a former CMS director under President George W. Bush who heads the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at the nonprofit Brookings Institution. "It's hard to see how that kind of participation would actually work."
The Congressional Budget Office estimates that by 2019, ACOs will save Medicare $1.2 billion a year. That's a sliver of Medicare's budget, but advocates hope the savings will grow over time. (Another provision of the law, an independent board that can compel broad reductions in Medicare, has greater potential for big short-term savings.)
Success may depend on CMS's rules. If the rules give providers too much flexibility, savings could vanish - or ACOs could even end up becoming a fiscal burden. If the rules are too strict, provider groups warn that few doctors and hospitals may join the experiment.