Page 2 of 2   <      

House votes to repeal health-care law

Swiftly honoring a campaign pledge, Republicans pushed legislation to repeal the nation's year-old health care overhaul through the House Wednesday, brushing aside opposition in the Senate and a veto threat from President Barack Obama.

As Republicans spoke of preserving parts of the legislation and Democrats talked about rethinking it, both parties tried to align their positions with public opinion. Americans are evenly split on the law overall, but fewer than one in five say all of it should be repealed, accordingto a new Washington Post-ABC News poll. More Americans say they prefer to eliminate only certain provisions.

Both sides claimed to be the champion of small business, older Americans and the middle class. GOP lawmakers contended that the law is leading business owners not to hire workers and insurance companies to raise their prices. Meanwhile, they said, older Americans are at risk of losing access to private health plans that take part in Medicare. Starting next year, the law is scheduled to curb increases in federal payments to such health plans for the older patients they enroll.

Democratic lawmakers countered with stories about children with leukemia who no longer can be refused insurance. And they spoke of older Americans who are beginning to receive better coverage for prescription drugs, as the law will gradually eliminate a gap in those benefits, commonly known as the "doughnut hole."

Repeatedly, Democrats used public disapproval of the insurance industry as a club in the debate, saying that repealing the law would, as House Minority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (Md.) put it, "put insurance companies back in charge of American health care."

The industry's main lobbying group, America's Health Insurance Plans, has taken no position on repealing the law, but the leaders of some major insurance companies have said they oppose the idea.

The two parties also spoke to the sympathies of specific constituencies. At one point, Reps. Louise McIntosh Slaughter (D-N.Y.) and Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) sparred over how women would be affected by a repeal of the legislation.

"Thanks to the new law, women do not have to worry anymore about being treated as second-class citizens," Slaughter said, arguing that the law will forbid insurance companies to charge women higher premiums and will require them to provide coverage for victims of domestic violence. Blackburn countered that the health-care overhaul would make it "more difficult for women under the age of 50 and over the age of 75 to get mammograms."

Democrats quoted new estimates by congressional budget analysts that show repealing the law would deepen federal deficits. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) disagreed, saying the Congressional Budget Office's predictions are flawed because the legislation "is riddled with double-counting and gimmicks."

At times during the seven-hour debate, members seemed to struggle to maintain a civil tone, recalling the often inflamed rhetoric about the measure as it worked its way through Congress last year.

"Why don't we just settle down and we can make some amendments to this bill?" Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) told his GOP colleagues. "I'm sure there are some things you'd like. But throwing it away is a political farce."

Republicans vowed to continue in their efforts to remake the law.

Said Rep. Michele Bachmann (Minn.): "To those . . . who think this may be a symbolic act, we have a message for them: This is not symbolic. This is why we were sent here, and we will not stop."

Staff writers David Fahrehthold and Felicia Sonmez contributed to this report.

<       2

© 2011 The Washington Post Company