washingtonpost.com
J.P. Morgan Chase knew of Madoff fraud scheme, suit alleges

By Jonathan Stempel
Friday, February 4, 2011; A09

NEW YORK - J.P. Morgan Chase executives stood by silently as their client Bernard Madoff ran his epic Ponzi scheme, hoping to protect the bank's investments and continue doing business with him, a newly released $6.4 billion lawsuit alleges.

Irving Picard, a court-appointed trustee seeking to recover money for former Madoff clients, made the accusation in his complaint against the second-largest U.S. bank, an edited version of which was made public Thursday.

"While numerous financial institutions enabled Madoff's fraud, JPMorgan Chase was at the very center of that fraud, and thoroughly complicit in it," the complaint filed with the U.S. bankruptcy court in Manhattan says.

The complaint shows for the first time how Picard thinks J.P. Morgan put its interests in preserving a decades-long relationship with Madoff ahead of trying to stop his long-suspected fraud, which was revealed Dec. 11, 2008.

"For whatever it's worth, I am sitting at lunch with [a bank employee] who just told me that there is a well-known cloud over the head of Madoff and that his returns are speculated to be part of a [P]onzi scheme," the complaint quotes from a June 15, 2007, e-mail by an investment bank risk officer.

The complaint also quotes a J.P. Morgan employee who had urged in February 2006 that the bank "assess quality and detail" of reports from Madoff's firm, noting potential "significant" penalties if statements proved "fraudulent or inaccurate."

Jennifer Zuccarelli, a J.P. Morgan spokeswoman, wrote in an e-mail that the New York-based bank will defend itself against Picard's accusations.

"JPMorgan did not know about or in any way become a party to the fraud orchestrated by Bernard Madoff," she wrote. "Madoff's firm was not an important or significant customer in the context of JPMorgan's commercial banking business, and the revenues earned from Madoff's bank account were modest and entirely consistent with conventional market rates and fees.

"The trustee makes no attempt to substantiate or support his unfounded claim that JPMorgan earned extraordinary sums from the Madoff account, and that claim is demonstrably false," she added.

Picard originally filed his complaint under seal. The edited version leaves out the names of employees thought to have been suspicious of Madoff's activities.

J.P. Morgan was the principal banker for Madoff's firm, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, for more than 20 years. Picard has been liquidating the firm since Madoff's estimated $65 billion Ponzi scheme was uncovered.

"The bank's top executives were warned in blunt terms about speculation that Madoff was running a Ponzi scheme, yet the bank appears to have been concerned only with protecting its own investments" in Madoff feeder funds, Deborah Renner, one of Picard's attorneys, said in a statement.

Renner said the bank had a "palpable concern that Madoff was a fraud for years" but waited until October 2008, two months before his firm collapsed, before reporting its concern to British government officials.

Regulators, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, have also been faulted by investors and politicians for missing red flags about Madoff's misconduct, which surfaced amid a global financial crisis.

J.P. Morgan chief executive Jamie Dimon complained last week at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, about persistent criticism of banks' activities, calling it "unproductive and unfair."

Picard has recovered about $10 billion from various parties to repay former Madoff clients.

He has filed more than $50 billion in lawsuits against individuals and businesses, including HSBC Holdings, UBS and Fred Wilpon, whose family owns the New York Mets baseball team. Wilpon said he may sell part of the Mets because of Picard's litigation.

Picard is seeking to recover from J.P. Morgan nearly $1 billion in fees and profits and $5.4 billion in damages.

Madoff, 72, admitted in his March 2009 guilty plea that the essence of his scheme was to deposit client money in a Chase account rather than invest it and generate returns as clients had believed. He is serving a 150-year sentence in a North Carolina federal prison.

- Reuters

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2011 The Washington Post Company