» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments
In Session

Congress is voting less this year, but is it actually working less?

Meet the leaders of House committees under the new GOP majority.

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, February 7, 2011; 8:57 PM

Sometimes it seems there aren't enough hours in the day for all that members of Congress have to do: Attend committee hearings, meet with constituents, tour their districts, ride in parades and kiss babies. Not to mention raise money and win reelection.

This Story

But the most basic function for any lawmaker is to stand up and be counted - to go to the House or Senate floor and cast votes. For the first month of the 112th Congress, members didn't do much of that.

The House held 25 recorded votes in the first month of this session, compared with 53 in the same period in the 111th Congress and 73 at the start of the 110th Congress. The Senate had just 11 recorded votes in the first month, after having 36 two years ago and 43 four years ago.

What's behind the precipitous drop? And are votes really a good barometer of how hard Congress is working? The answers are different for each chamber.

In the House, where the party in charge can do nearly anything it wants, the relatively small number of votes reflects a deliberate decision by Republicans to begin the year differently.

"This Congress, the calendar promotes quality over quantity, allowing time for substantive committee work in addition to votes on the floor," said Laena Fallon, spokeswoman for House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.).

Fallon noted that House committees and subcommittees have been busy holding hearings, including more than 30 sessions scheduled for this week.

In a December letter to colleagues explaining the schedule for this Congress, Cantor emphasized that certain kinds of votes would happen far less often: "Gone are congratulatory resolutions. Post office namings will be handled on a less frequent basis." Cantor added that the schedule would include at least one week of recess every month so "members could return home to listen to their constituents on a regular basis," as they did last week.

The House further pared back its vote calendar for a few days in mid-January after the shootings in Tucson that wounded Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.).

But the House calendar also represents a choice on the part of GOP leaders to retain a relatively narrow focus in the first weeks of the session - at least compared to the last time Republicans took control of the chamber: After Republicans captured control of Congress in the 1994 election, the House held 90 recorded votes during the first month of the 104th Congress.

That flurry of activity in 1995 came as Republicans sought to keep the promises they made in the "Contract With America," and the House voted in the first 100 days of the session on a host of ambitious bills. Similarly, in 2007 the new Democratic majority passed a half-dozen key bills in the first 100 hours of the Congress.

This year, by contrast, GOP leaders took power with a narrower list of immediate priorities, including last month's vote to repeal President Obama's health-reform bill and a handful of initiatives to cut government spending. Their 2010 "Pledge to America" did not include a vow to pass any bills in a certain time frame.


CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments
© 2011 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile