» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments

The Breaking News Blog

All the latest news from the District, Maryland and Virginia

Retiree feels left out of highway plan

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
Saturday, February 12, 2011; 5:40 PM

Dear Dr. Gridlock:

I have read your columns regarding the proposal to replace the high-occupancy vehicle lanes on Interstate 95 in Virginia with high-occupancy toll lanes. In every instance that I can recall, you have dealt only with rush-hour and job commuters. How about the rest of us?

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

I am a retired federal employee who lives approximately one mile off I-95. Although I do not have to use this corridor during rush periods, I do use it to travel to points in Arlington and Fairfax counties as well as in D.C. on a regular basis at other times.

I attempt to take advantage of the HOV lanes whenever possible. I do this both for convenience and speed, as well as for safety. Two lanes of limited-access, express traffic are usually safer than three or four lanes of constantly merging, slowing or speeding traffic.

If the HOT lane conversion goes in as described, I will be deprived of their use. As a retiree, and a Virginia resident of approximately 30 years, I have paid taxes to construct and improve these roads.

( I know you will dismiss this argument, as my personal contribution probably paid for only a guardrail and some pothole filling, but that is what citizens pay taxes for: the right to use all the facilities.)

Further, as a retiree, I cannot afford to pay tolls over a distance of 30 miles or so for the privilege of a safer, faster commute. While I can at least accept (even while I disagree with) the rationale for charging tolls during "peak usage" times allegedly to better control traffic, I cannot accept the greedy state-private partnership discriminating against citizens such as myself who attempt to use this corridor in a rational, low-impact manner.

No one so far is even thinking about the impact on drivers who use this corridor in allegedly non-peak times, let alone giving any consideration to making the HOT lanes free for our use during certain times of low usage.

- Lawrence Kandrach, Prince William County

This was one of many letters received after last week's column on Virginia's new plan to build HOT lanes on I-95 to just north of the Capital Beltway, abandoning the original plan to include much of I-395 as well.

I shared the letter with a group of federal retirees in the Springfield area who had invited me to chat about local transportation. These folks, who have plenty of experience using the corridor as commuters and retirees, were sympathetic on some aspects of the letter writer's case - as was I - but they raised some issues, too.

First, anyone trying to navigate this region safely has my sympathy. The suburbs are filled with graying baby boomers who don't have convenient access to transit, especially for the midday trips they want to make.


CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments
© 2011 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile