» This Story:Read +| Comments

Court: Victim's dying words may be used at trial

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, February 28, 2011; 7:44 PM

Prosecutors may use victim statements given at the crime scene even if the victim dies before testifying at trial, the Supreme Court ruled Monday.

This Story

The decision is a step back from the court's recent decisions that the Constitution demands that the witness be present and available for cross-examination. A majority of the court drew a distinction between statements made during an emergency created by a crime event and statements made when police are investigating the crime.

The ruling could reinstate murder charges against a Detroit man who in 2001 was identified by his victim shortly before the victim died of his wounds.

The 6-to-2 ruling drew a withering dissent from Justice Antonin Scalia, the court's most outspoken advocate for the Sixth Amendment's requirement that the accused "be confronted with the witnesses against him."

The majority's reasoning, Scalia wrote, "is so transparently false that professing to believe it demeans this institution."

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who wrote for the majority, shot back, accusing Scalia of "misreading" the rules the court set for when statements could be admitted as evidence.

"The dissent criticizes the complexity of our approach, but we, at least, are unwilling to sacrifice accuracy for simplicity," Sotomayor wrote for her colleagues.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg sided with Scalia but declined to join his caustic comments. Justice Elena Kagan was recused from the case because she had worked on it as President Obama's solicitor general.

The court's "Confrontation Clause" jurisprudence is one of the areas in which its usual ideological divisions don't apply. Starting with a decision in 2004, Scalia has been the most outspoken about the absolute requirements of the clause, even when it might undermine criminal prosecutions and set the accused free.

The Michigan Supreme Court relied on those decisions in the case of Richard Bryant, who had been convicted of second-degree murder in the death of Anthony Covington.

In 2001, Detroit police were called to a gas station where Covington lay bleeding with a gunshot wound to the stomach. Asked what had happened, Covington replied, "I was shot" or "Rick shot me," depending on the recollections of the five police officers on the scene.

In the five to 10 minutes before medical personnel arrived, police pieced together the story that Bryant had shot Covington through Bryant's back door and that Covington had driven himself to the gas station. Covington died a few hours later.


CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +| Comments

More on the Supreme Court

[The Supreme Court]

The Supreme Court

Full coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court, including key cases and nominations to the nation's highest court.

[Guantanamo Prison]

Guantanamo Prison

Full coverage of the U.S. prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, including Supreme Court rulings over its legality.

© 2011 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile