washingtonpost.com
Midwest union battles highlight debate over improving schools

By Nick Anderson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, March 3, 2011; 12:15 PM

INDIANAPOLIS - The Republican faceoff with labor unions in the Midwest and elsewhere marks not just a fight over money and collective bargaining, but also a test of wills over how to improve the nation's schools.

GOP governors are pushing to limit teacher bargaining rights, dismantle teacher tenure and channel public money toward private schools. All are direct challenges to the teachers unions and their mostly Democratic political allies in Congress and in statehouses across the nation.

This approach to school reform is far more confrontational than President Obama's and threatens to polarize what has been a largely bipartisan movement to overhaul education. Analysts say teachers might grow leery of signing onto a school improvement agenda if they believe it will trample their rights.

"This is big," Rick Muir, president of the Indiana Federation of Teachers, said of the Republican agenda. "It's not one item. It's not two. They've seized the opportunity to go on the attack. They're going for the jugular."

Here in Indiana, Gov. Mitch Daniels (R), a possible 2012 presidential contender, and several of his Republican peers are pushing a bill to connect teacher evaluations with test scores, launch a system of performance-based pay and make it easier to dismiss teachers repeatedly rated ineffective or in need of improvement. Other Daniels-backed bills would offer publicly funded vouchers to help children of low to moderate means attend private school and narrow the scope of collective bargaining to wages and benefits.

The governor calls vouchers a matter of "simple justice" for families that lack options. He says teacher contracts too often hamstring administrators, setting rules for when principals can call staff meetings or who can monitor students at recess. And while he says that "teachers should have tenure," Daniels believes they should have to earn it through proven ability.

"I've been praising teachers and public education and trying to support it relentlessly for six years," the governor said. "It does no good. When you cross the union, you're the enemy."

For more than a week, Indiana's House of Representatives has been frozen by a Democratic walkout, echoing a standoff in the Wisconsin Senate. Pro-union demonstrations are popping up across the state and filling the Statehouse. One day, a guitarist sang the Woody Guthrie folk anthem "This Land is Your Land" to union backers inside the Statehouse while tea party activists ridiculed absent Democrats as "fleehadists" in a counter-demonstration on a sidewalk outside.

For decades, teacher unions have been a major force in education. In the District, as well as Maryland and other states where teachers have collective bargaining rights, unions can shape school reform through contract talks. In Virginia and other states where they do not have bargaining rights ¿ mostly in the South ¿ teachers unions push their cause through school boards and other channels. They also wield clout in local, state and federal elections, generally supporting Democrats.

But teachers unions are suddenly on the defensive across much of the nation. Debates over collective bargaining rights are flaring in Wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio, Idaho and Tennessee. GOP governors in New Jersey, Nevada and Florida have mounted a drumbeat against teacher tenure, opposing seniority-based job protections in much blunter terms than the president and most other Democrats.

"If you have someone who's proposing to do away with bargaining rights, a line has been drawn in the sand," said Richard W. Hurd, a labor relations expert at Cornell University. "In an environment like that it creates incredible tensions. Teachers are going to be very suspicious."

It is unclear how long Indiana's House Democrats can stave off the GOP bills. Most Democratic lawmakers fled the state Feb. 22 to deny Republicans a quorum required for action. There were signs of a thaw Wednesday as the House Democratic leader returned from Urbana, Ill., to talk with Republicans.

Rep. Mary Ann Sullivan (D), who teamed with Republicans on the charter school bill, said she could envision backing some other GOP education bills if amended. But she called the voucher proposal an overreach.

"I'm not happy that some of the reforms are getting dragged into this brawl," Sullivan said Wednesday. "It's a shame."

The Statehouse battle perplexes teachers at Shortridge High School, alma mater of U.S. Sen. Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.) and the late author Kurt Vonnegut Jr. The theme of the 600-student magnet school is law and public policy.

Alene Smith, 48, a social studies teacher and union representative, said vet­eran teachers must be shielded from arbitrary firings. She said it would be "a little frightening" if union rights are stripped: "I'm old. I'm expensive. You could hire two people out of college for what you pay me."

But Republicans say union leaders are not representing all teachers.

"There is a tremendous difference in desire for reform between teachers and the teachers unions," said Tony Bennett, Indiana's superintendent of public instruction. "Teachers want what's best for children. The teachers union is an institution built to protect the interests of itself and adults."

Labor leaders dismiss such criticism, pointing to rallies here and across the state as evidence of the zeal of their members to support public education.

Nathan G. Schnellenberger, president of the Indiana State Teachers Association, is seeking to preserve influence following the Republican takeover of the Indiana House. He said teachers face painful choices: They can refuse to negotiate on the GOP package ¿ and lose big. Or they can shave their losses by pushing a few pragmatic Republicans to amend the bills.

"I have to live in the reality of the moment," he said from his office overlooking the Statehouse. "I've counted the votes."

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2011 The Washington Post Company